Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39979547›Full record

ArticleJournal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology2025

Evaluating personal care product use by Environmental Working Group hazard scores in relation to consumers' sociodemographic characteristics, purchasing behaviors, and product safety perceptions.

Emily S Barrett, Karolin Wadie, Kylie Getz, Patricia Greenberg, Taina Moore, Adana A M Llanos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Analyzing the landscape of "clean" products for textured hair at a Los Angeles Target.Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Emily S BarrettDepartment of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Rutgers School of Public Health, Piscataway, NJ, USA. Emily.barrett@eohsi.rutgers.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9463-524X
Karolin WadieDepartment of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Rutgers School of Public Health, Piscataway, NJ, USA.
Kylie GetzDepartment of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Rutgers School of Public Health, Piscataway, NJ, USA.
Patricia GreenbergDepartment of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Rutgers School of Public Health, Piscataway, NJ, USA.
Taina MooreEnvironmental and Occupational Health Sciences Institute, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ, USA.
Adana A M LlanosDepartment of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.

Funding

Translational Research Support CoreP30ES005022 · NIEHS · UNIV OF MED/DENT NJ-R W JOHNSON MED SCH · PI PANOS G. GEORGOPOULOS · 1988 to 2026
$47.4M
TRAINING IN EVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGYT32ES007148 · NIEHS · RUTGERS THE ST UNIV OF NJ NEW BRUNSWICK · PI Lauren M Aleksunes · 1987 to 2026
$11.4M
NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES005022NIEHS NIH HHS T32 ES007148
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPersonal care products (PCPs) are a source of environmental chemical exposures. Little research has examined the specific PCPs people use, the environmental hazards posed by those PCPs, and factors informing PCP selection.

objectiveTo examine chemical hazards of the specific products used in relation to sociodemographic factors, purchasing behaviors, and perceptions about PCP safety.

methodsIn a cross-sectional, university-based sample (NJ, USA, N = 593), participants reported on sociodemographics, PCP purchasing behaviors and perceptions, and PCP use in the last 24-48 h (including brand and product name). Those PCPs were linked to product hazard scores (1=least hazardous, 10=most hazardous) in the Environmental Working Group's Skin Deep® database. For each participant, we calculated average hazard scores across all PCPs used and by category (e.g., haircare, skincare) and evaluated use of PCPs with high hazard scores (7-10). We fitted adjusted regression models examining associations of sociodemographic factors and participants' perceptions and purchasing behaviors with product hazard scores.

resultsOf 9349 unique PCPs used by participants, 68% matched to Skin Deep®. Average hazard scores varied by participant characteristics (e.g., age) for perfumes/colognes, beauty, and skin care products. The relative risk (RR) of recent use of a hair product with a high hazard score was twice as high in non-Hispanic Black women compared to non-Hispanic White women (RR:1.99; 95%CI:1.37, 2.89). Frequent use of healthy product apps (β = -0.49, 95%CI:-0.77, -0.21), reading product ingredient labels (β = -0.26; 95%CI:-0.82, -0.30), and seeking eco-friendly products (β = -0.17; 95%CI:-0.36, -0.01) were associated with use of skin care products with lower hazard scores. Results for hair and beauty products were similar. Concerns about PCP health impacts and regulation were associated with using products with lower hazard scores. IMPACT STATEMENT: Personal care products (PCPs) can contain numerous endocrine disrupting and carcinogenic chemicals. In a U.S. university-based sample, we linked the PCPs used by participants in the last 24-48 h to hazard scores in the Skin Deep® database. Average hazard scores of the PCPs used by participants varied by sociodemographic factors. Participant behaviors (e.g., use of healthy product apps) and perceptions of PCP safety and regulation were associated with the average hazard scores of the PCPs they used. Our findings suggest that education and tools to inform PCP choice may help consumers choose safer products and potentially, reduce chemical exposures.

Indexed as

Consumer BehaviorConsumer Product SafetyCosmeticsEnvironmental ExposureHazardous SubstancesAdolescentAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSociodemographic FactorsSocioeconomic FactorsYoung AdultCosmeticsHazardous Substancescommercial determinants of healthendocrine disrupting chemicalsenvironmental health disparitiesEnvironmental Working GroupPersonal care products

Identifiers

PMID39979547
PMCPMC12583145

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.