ArticleScientific reports2025
Gender-differences in imaging phenotypes of osteoarthritis in the osteoarthritis initiative.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of orally administered cetylated fatty acids on symptoms and functional capacity in patients with knee osteoarthritis: results of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.European journal of clinical nutrition · 2025Trial
- Advanced Biomaterial-Based In Vitro Osteoarthritis Models: Integrating Sex as a Biological Variable in Hormonal, Subchondral Bone, and Mechanobiological Pathways.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Review
- Biomechanical effects of squatting movements in Tai Chi on the knee joint.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Article
- Localisation-Dependent Variations in Articular Cartilage ECM: Implications for Tissue Engineering and Cartilage Repair.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In osteoarthritis (OA) research it is increasingly recognized that stratification according to disease phenotypes is essential for optimizing treatment regimens. Gender-specific differences in clinical OA manifestations have been identified, and this analysis aimed to assess whether these differences extend to imaging phenotypes.From the Osteoarthritis Initiative database 2523 participants (1409 women and 1114 men) with completed 3T MRI and whole-organ magnetic resonance imaging scores (WORMS) of the right knee at baseline were included. Imaging phenotypes were assigned based on modified Rapid OsteoArthritis MRI Eligibility Score: the inflammatory, meniscus-cartilage, and bone phenotype. Logistic regression was performed to investigate the effect of gender on phenotype, independent of BMI, race, Kellgren & Lawrence (KL) grade and level of physical activity. Female gender was independently associated with lower odds for the meniscus-cartilage (OR 0.61, 95%CI 0.47-0.80, p < 0.001) but not for the inflammatory (OR 1.04, 95%CI 0.89-1.24, p = 0.697) or the subchondral bone phenotype (OR 1.13, 95%CI 0.95-1.36, p = 0.166). This difference highlights an opportunity for future refinements to better accommodate gender/sex differences in disease trajectories while investigating different treatment regimes in knee OA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.