ArticleScientific reports2025
Optimization of ultrasound-assisted deep eutectic solvents extraction of rutin from Ilex asprella using response surface methodology.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Supramolecular solvents based on deep eutectic solvents and hexafluorobutanol for the extraction of aristolochic acids from natural plants.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2026Article
- Comparative evaluation of ultrasound-assisted extraction and micelle-mediated extraction of bioactive compound from Acmella oleracea.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Extraction ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Unlocking the Functional Food Potential ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Taking the extraction amount of rutin as the index, the extraction process of rutin from Ilex asprella (Hook. et Arn.) Champ. ex Benth. using the ultrasonic-assisted deep eutectic solvent method was optimized through response surface method. The effects of various factors, including the types of deep eutectic solvent, molar ratio of the solvent, water content, liquid-solid ratio, the temperature, power and time of ultrasound on the extraction amount of rutin were investigated. In accordance with the result of univariate experiments, the extraction process was optimized through employing the Box-Behnken response surface design method. A three-factor, three-level experimental model was established with the liquid-solid ratio, water content and ultrasonic time as variables. The findings indicated that the optimal technological conditions were as stated below: the molar ratio of lactic acid to choline chloride at 1:1, the ultrasonic extraction temperature at 40 °C, the ultrasonic extraction time at 31 min, the water content at 28%, and the liquid-solid ratio at 20:1 mL/g. Under optimal conditions, the validation experimental result revealed that the extraction amount of rutin was 86.553 ± 1.35 µg/g, with an absolute error of less than 0.6% in comparison with the predicted value of the model. The use of deep eutectic solvents for the extraction of rutin and the application of response surface method for optimizing the extraction process of rutin from Ilex asprella (Hook. et Arn.) Champ. ex Benth. were demonstrated. The present study provided a reference for the comprehensive utilization of Ilex asprella (Hook. et Arn.) Champ. ex Benth..
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.