ArticleScientific reports2025
The relationship between body mass index and pathological complete response in Brazilian breast cancer patients.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Body Mass Index Does Not Predict High Miller-Payne Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Stage II-III Breast Cancer: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study of 647 Patients.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- The impact of body mass index on the efficacy of CDK4/6 inhibitors in patients with metastatic breast cancer.Annals of medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Body mass index (BMI) is a key factor in the progression of breast cancer (BC), with conflicting evidence on its influence on pathological complete response (pCR) following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). Despite these global findings, studies focusing on real-world Brazilian data remain scarce. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of BMI on pCR rates, recurrence-free survival (RFS), and overall survival (OS) in Brazilian women with BC treated with NAC. A retrospective cohort of 1,751 patients with stage I-III invasive primary BC treated between January 2011 and December 2020 at two public healthcare centers Hospital Pérola Byington (HPB) and Hospital do Servidor Público Estadual (HSPE) in Brazil was analyzed. Data included BMI categories (normal, overweight, and obese) and their associations with pCR, RFS, and OS outcomes. Obesity was prevalent (35.5%) among the cohort, with most patients being postmenopausal (50.9%). Tumors were predominantly stage III invasive ductal carcinoma, with triple-negative and luminal B subtypes being the most common. Radical surgery was performed in 79.8% of cases, achieving a pCR rate of 22.3%, and 30.9% of patients experienced recurrence, predominantly systemic (27.7%). No significant differences in pCR, RFS, or OS were observed across BMI categories. BMI was not associated with pCR, RFS, or OS in this large Brazilian cohort, highlighting the need for further studies to explore BMI dynamics during treatment and its potential influence on therapeutic outcomes. Future investigations in diverse healthcare settings may provide additional insights into optimizing breast cancer management across BMI strata.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.