ArticleCommunications biology2025
Learning to operate an imagined speech Brain-Computer Interface involves the spatial and frequency tuning of neural activity.
Article in Communications biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Non-Invasive Brain-Computer Interfaces: Converging Frontiers in Neural Signal Decoding and Flexible Bioelectronics Integration.Nano-micro letters · 2026Review
- Spiking neural networks provide accurate and time-efficient models for whisker stimulus classification of the awake mouse.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Article
- Distributed cortico-subcortical networks enable robust speech state detection from sparse intracranial recordings.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Article
- EEG Resting-state Microstate Dynamics in Children and Adolescents with Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder (ARFID).Brain topography · 2025Article
- Systematic review: progress in EEG-based speech imagery brain-computer interface decoding and encoding research.PeerJ. Computer science · 2025Article
- Adaptive LDA Classifier Enhances Real-Time Control of an EEG Brain-Computer Interface for Decoding Imagined Syllables.Brain sciences · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Brain-Computer Interfaces (BCI) will revolutionize the way people with severe impairment of speech production can communicate. While current efforts focus on training classifiers on vast amounts of neurophysiological signals to decode imagined speech, much less attention has been given to users' ability to adapt their neural activity to improve BCI-control. To address whether BCI-control improves with training and characterize the underlying neural dynamics, we trained 15 healthy participants to operate a binary BCI system based on electroencephalography (EEG) signals through syllable imagery for five consecutive days. Despite considerable interindividual variability in performance and learning, a significant improvement in BCI-control was globally observed. Using a control experiment, we show that a continuous feedback about the decoded activity is necessary for learning to occur. Performance improvement was associated with a broad EEG power increase in frontal theta activity and focal enhancement in temporal low-gamma activity, showing that learning to operate an imagined-speech BCI involves dynamic changes in neural features at different spectral scales. These findings demonstrate that combining machine and human learning is a successful strategy to enhance BCI controllability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.