Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39979463›Full record

ArticleCommunications biology2025

Learning to operate an imagined speech Brain-Computer Interface involves the spatial and frequency tuning of neural activity.

Kinkini Bhadra, Anne-Lise Giraud, Silvia Marchesotti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kinkini BhadraDepartment of Basic Neurosciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5176-1369
Anne-Lise Giraud *Department of Basic Neurosciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Silvia Marchesotti *Department of Basic Neurosciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland. silvia.marchesotti@unige.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3735-2603

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brain-Computer Interfaces (BCI) will revolutionize the way people with severe impairment of speech production can communicate. While current efforts focus on training classifiers on vast amounts of neurophysiological signals to decode imagined speech, much less attention has been given to users' ability to adapt their neural activity to improve BCI-control. To address whether BCI-control improves with training and characterize the underlying neural dynamics, we trained 15 healthy participants to operate a binary BCI system based on electroencephalography (EEG) signals through syllable imagery for five consecutive days. Despite considerable interindividual variability in performance and learning, a significant improvement in BCI-control was globally observed. Using a control experiment, we show that a continuous feedback about the decoded activity is necessary for learning to occur. Performance improvement was associated with a broad EEG power increase in frontal theta activity and focal enhancement in temporal low-gamma activity, showing that learning to operate an imagined-speech BCI involves dynamic changes in neural features at different spectral scales. These findings demonstrate that combining machine and human learning is a successful strategy to enhance BCI controllability.

Indexed as

BrainBrain-Computer InterfacesImaginationLearningSpeechAdultElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansMaleYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID39979463
PMCPMC11842755

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.