ArticleScientific reports2025
Undergraduate medical students' perceptions and perspectives on their clinical reasoning learning experiences.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Medical students' perceptions of the impact of case-based learning on engagement, cognitive skills, and communication.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Enhancing diagnostic logic in high-acuity care: evidence from an online flipped classroom intervention in emergency medicine.BMC medical education · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Clinical reasoning (CR) is an essential cognitive skill that medical students should learn early in their training. However, medical students find learning CR challenging. This study aimed to explore medical students' perceptions and experiences during CR training. A qualitative study design was employed, collecting data from 26 undergraduate medical students via semi-structured interviews. After teaching a case-based scenario using a "Patient Note Form" (PNF), participants were interviewed with three open-ended questions to evaluate their CR learning experiences. Data was analyzed using inductive thematic analysis. Three themes emerged regarding CR learning during the pediatric rotation: 'Favorable Experience,' 'Challenges,' and 'Helpful Practices'. Students generally reported positive learning experiences, satisfaction, and recognition of the exercises' benefits and strengths. However, they also identified challenges such as knowledge gaps and difficulties in data processing that hindered their CR processes. A solid knowledge base is seen helpful to expedite efficient diagnostic hypothesis generation. So, students expressed satisfaction with their CR learning experience, found it favorable, and believed it would aid their future professional development. Given the importance of CR and the challenges students encounter in mastering it, further research to develop innovative teaching and assessment methods is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.