Observational studyJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2025
The effect of using dexmedetomidine versus morphine as sedation on long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes of encephalopathic neonates undergoing therapeutic hypothermia.
Observational study in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Analgosedation in Neonatal Intensive Care: Current Strategies, Challenges, and Future Perspectives.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Pharmacological therapy of neonatal analgosedation: current status, dilemmas, and perspectives.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo compare neurodevelopmental outcomes using Bayley Scales of Infant Development (BSID), between encephalopathic neonates undergoing therapeutic hypothermia (TH), sedated with either continuous dexmedetomidine or intermittent morphine. STUDY
designRetrospective, observational cohort study including encephalopathic neonates born between 2014 - 2022 that underwent TH at two Regional Perinatal Centres, and completed neurodevelopmental follow-up assessments.
resultsThere were no significant differences in demographics or short-term neurologic outcomes between morphine (n = 30) and dexmedetomidine (n = 32) groups. At 12 months, median motor composite scores (104 vs 98.5, p = 0.02) and median fine motor scaled scores (SS) (11 vs 10, p = 0.01) were significantly higher in the dexmedetomidine group. Median expressive language SS were slightly higher in the morphine group (11 v 10, p = 0.05). BSID scores at 18-24 months were similar.
conclusionThis study supports the use of dexmedetomidine as first-line sedation agent during TH, given comparable 18-24 month neurodevelopmental outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39979431What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.