ArticleScientific reports2025
Cause-specific mortality after spousal bereavement in a Danish register-based cohort.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Grief-Related Chest Pain: A Review, Conceptual Analysis, and Integrative Model.Psychophysiology · 2026Pooled it
- Digital Health Intervention for and Long-Term Health Outcomes of a Divorce Cohort With Linked Danish Data: 5-Year Posttrial Follow-Up of a Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Trial
- The Aarhus bereavement study (TABstudy).European journal of epidemiology · 2026Article
- Bereavement and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Independent associations of social determinants of health with mortality and added predictive value beyond life's essential 8.Journal of health, population, and nutrition · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Spousal bereavement is associated with increased all-cause mortality, but less is known for cause-specific mortality. We estimated the average effect of bereavement on cause-specific mortality. Furthermore, we developed and evaluated the performance of prediction models estimating individualized mortality risks. This matched cohort study leveraged nationwide registry data on 223,500 married Danish individuals aged ≥ 65 years. Individuals were followed from bereavement date until death, emigration, or 3-year end of follow-up. G-estimation was used to estimate the average effect of bereavement on cause-specific mortality. Risk prediction models were developed and internally validated using logistic regression and Extreme Gradient Boosting utilizing information on sociodemographic factors and healthcare expenditures prior to bereavement. Among males, bereavement was associated with increased 3-year mortality from cardiovascular disease (CVD) (Risk Difference: 8 deaths/1000 individuals [95% confidence intervals (CI) 3;13]), digestive diseases (3 [95% CI 1;5]), psychiatric diseases/suicide (3 [95% CI 1;5]), and respiratory diseases (4 [95% CI 1;8]) and decreased 3-year mortality for dying from dementia/Parkinson's disease (-4 [95% CI -6;-2]). Among females, bereavement was only associated with increased 3-year mortality from CVD (5 [95% CI 3;7 ]) and from psychiatric diseases/suicide (1 [95% CI 1;2]). The prediction models developed using sociodemographic information and healthcare expenditures showed limited accuracy in identifying cause-specific mortality risk. On average, spousal bereavement slightly elevated the risk for most causes of death for males and less so for females. Despite incorporating comprehensive healthcare and sociodemographic data, accurately predicting individual cause-specific mortality remains challenging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.