ArticleScientific reports2025
IoT-driven smart assistive communication system for the hearing impaired with hybrid deep learning models for sign language recognition.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Improving sign Language recognition system for assisting deaf and dumb people using pathfinder algorithm with representation learning model.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Assistive communication system using deep sparse autoencoder with feature learning to assist people with hearing disabilities.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Deep computer vision with artificial intelligence based sign language recognition to assist hearing and speech-impaired individuals.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Harnessing attention-driven hybrid deep learning with combined feature representation for precise sign language recognition to aid deaf and speech-impaired people.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Deaf and hard-of-hearing people utilize sign language recognition (SLR) to interconnect. Sign language (SL) is vital for hard-of-hearing and deaf individuals to communicate. SL uses varied hand gestures to speak words, sentences, or letters. It aids in linking the gap of communication between individuals with hearing loss and other persons. Also, it creates comfortable for individuals with hearing loss to convey their feelings. The Internet of Things (IoTs) can help persons with disabilities sustain their desire to attain a good quality of life and permit them to contribute to their economic and social lives. Modern machine learning (ML) and computer vision (CV) developments have allowed SL gesture detection and decipherment. This study presents a Smart Assistive Communication System for the Hearing-Impaired using Sign Language Recognition with Hybrid Deep Learning (SACHI-SLRHDL) methodology in IoT. The SACHI-SLRHDL technique aims to assist people with hearing impairments by creating an intelligent solution. At the primary stage, the SACHI-SLRHDL technique utilizes bilateral filtering (BF) for image pre-processing to increase the excellence of the captured images by reducing noise while preserving edges. Furthermore, the improved MobileNetV3 model is employed for the feature extraction process. Moreover, the convolutional neural network with a bidirectional gated recurrent unit and attention (CNN-BiGRU-A) model classifier is implemented for the SLR process. Finally, the attraction-repulsion optimization algorithm (AROA) adjusts the hyperparameter values of the CNN-BiGRU-A method optimally, resulting in more excellent classification performance. To exhibit the more significant solution of the SACHI-SLRHDL method, a comprehensive experimental analysis is performed under an Indian SL dataset. The experimental validation of the SACHI-SLRHDL method portrayed a superior accuracy value of 99.19% over existing techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.