Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39979393›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Development and validation of a new equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate in Argentinian adults.

Pehuén Fernández, María Laura Nores, Walter Douthat, Javier de Arteaga, Pablo Luján, Emanuel José Saad, Sofía Naser, Jorge de la Fuente, Carlos Chiurchiu

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Pehuén FernándezNephrology Service, Hospital Privado Universitario de Córdoba, Av. Naciones Unidas 346, Córdoba, Argentina. pehuenfernandez@hotmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-1518-0377
María Laura NoresFacultad de Matemática, Astronomía, Física y Computación (FAMAF), Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Córdoba, Argentina.
Walter DouthatNephrology Service, Hospital Privado Universitario de Córdoba, Av. Naciones Unidas 346, Córdoba, Argentina.
Javier de ArteagaNephrology Service, Hospital Privado Universitario de Córdoba, Av. Naciones Unidas 346, Córdoba, Argentina.
Pablo LujánClinical Biochemistry Laboratory, Hospital Privado Universitario de Córdoba, Córdoba, Argentina.
Emanuel José SaadInstituto Universitario de Ciencias Biomédicas de Córdoba (IUCBC), Córdoba, Argentina.
Sofía NaserNephrology Service, Hospital Privado Universitario de Córdoba, Av. Naciones Unidas 346, Córdoba, Argentina.
Jorge de la FuenteNephrology Service, Hospital Privado Universitario de Córdoba, Av. Naciones Unidas 346, Córdoba, Argentina.
Carlos ChiurchiuNephrology Service, Hospital Privado Universitario de Córdoba, Av. Naciones Unidas 346, Córdoba, Argentina.

Funding

Secretaria de Ciencia y Tecnología - Universidad Nacional de Córdoba Project 33620180100055CB
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Latin Americans are underrepresented in the current equations used to estimate glomerular filtration rate (GFR), and the applicability of their predictions to this population may therefore be questionable. The objective of this study was to develop a new equation to estimate GFR based on data from Argentina. A cross-sectional study was conducted. We included 583 Argentinian adults in development sample (DS) and 78 in temporary validation sample (TVS). Urinary iothalamate clearance (reference method), and different predictive variables were used to develop candidate equations to estimate GFR. The performance was assessed through 10-fold cross-validation in DS, and by direct validation in TVS, using root mean squared error (RMSE), correlation (r), bias, P15, P30 and correct classification percentage (CC%) in CKD stages. The Argentinian equation (AE) chosen is based on a quasi-likelihood model which predicts GFR from creatinine, age, sex, single kidney, albumin and urea. Within the previous creatinine based equations (MDRD, MCQ, CKD-EPI and EKFC), the ones with the best performance were CKD-EPI 2009 and 2021. In the DS, AE showed lower RMSE, similar r, higher P15, median bias closer to zero and higher CC% compared to CKD-EPI 2009, and very slight differences in comparison to CKD-EPI 2021. In the TVS, AE presented lower RMSE, higher (or equal) r, P30 and CC%, and median bias closer to 0 compared to CKD-EPI in its two versions. In addition, it presented higher P15 than CKD-EPI 2009. In conclusion, AE presented a better performance to estimate GFR in Argentinian people and its use could have a positive impact on the clinical management of these patients.

Indexed as

Glomerular Filtration RateRenal Insufficiency, ChronicAdultAgedArgentinaCreatinineCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedCreatinineArgentinian peopleCreatinine-based equationsGlomerular filtration rateIothalamate meglumineKidney function tests

Identifiers

PMID39979393
PMCPMC11842545

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.