ArticleScientific reports2025
The German adaptation of the Amputee Body Image Scale and the importance of psychosocial adjustment to prosthesis use.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Feeling (in)complete: neural correlates of perceived body integrity in individuals with lower limb amputation.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Negative cognitions related to one's own body, here referred to as body image disturbances (BID), are common after lower limb amputation and correlate with weak psychological functioning. The Amputee Body Image Scale (ABIS) is internationally used to assess BID in persons with lower limb amputation. However, there is no psychometrically evaluated German adaptation available. Including a sample of 191 individuals with lower limb amputation, the present study developed and psychometrically evaluated the German ABIS. Results suggest high reliability in terms of internal consistency and stability of the measure over two years. Meaningful and significant relationships to sex, amputation level, post-amputation pain, mobility, and psychopathology indicate validity of the instrument. Multivariate analyses emphasize a specific and inverse relationship between BID and psychosocial adaptation to the prosthesis including its embodiment. Focussing on ABIS items that are independent of the type of amputation or rehabilitation experiences resulted in an ABIS short form with psychometric properties comparable to the long form. This instrument could be prospectively used in diverse limb loss populations, such as individuals with upper limb amputation or persons not using a prosthesis. The present results thus crucially contribute to the repertoire of patient-reported outcome measures in the context of post-amputation rehabilitation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.