ArticleScientific reports2025
No change in key reef fish herbivores or reef fisher yields in Barbados a decade after the lionfish invasion.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Red lionfish, Pterois volitans, a non-native marine species with potential to cause significant damage to Caribbean coral reefs, reached Barbados in late 2011. In 2012, before lionfish became locally established, fish surveys at ten reef sites in Barbados were undertaken every four months over a year to generate baseline data. Fisher catch surveys were also undertaken at two main landing sites twice in a year. A decade later, all surveys were repeated at the same sites. Post-invasion lionfish biomass was low across most sites and increased with site depth, likely due to fishing. A comparison of reef fish biomass of selected key herbivores of high ecological and commercial importance (parrotfishes and surgeonfishes) and forage fish groups (damselfishes and wrasses) pre- and post-invasion indicated no detectable effects of lionfish on the key herbivores and wrasses, although damselfish biomass did decline with lionfish biomass increases. We also found no evidence of a decline in fisher catch rates, suggesting no negative impacts on fisher earnings. Furthermore, catch composition remained virtually unchanged for trap fishers, while lionfish had become an important component of the catch of spearfishers. Overall, our results suggest that control of lionfish through sustained fishing effectively protects key fish herbivores and might indirectly benefit reefs through a release of fishing pressure on native fishes by spearfishers now targeting lionfish.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.