Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39979359›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

The effect of irrigation quota on straw decomposition, nitrogen release, and maize nitrogen uptake.

Lihua Zhang, Chen Xu, Weiping Yan, Ning Sun, Hongxiang Zhao, Yanchun Feng, Guobo Tan, Shaofeng Bian

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Lihua Zhang *Institute of Agricultural Resources and Environment Research, Jilin Academy of Agricultural Science/Northeast Agricultural Research Center of China, Changchun, 130033, China.
Chen Xu *Institute of Agricultural Resources and Environment Research, Jilin Academy of Agricultural Science/Northeast Agricultural Research Center of China, Changchun, 130033, China.
Weiping YanInstitute of Agricultural Resources and Environment Research, Jilin Academy of Agricultural Science/Northeast Agricultural Research Center of China, Changchun, 130033, China.
Ning SunInstitute of Agricultural Resources and Environment Research, Jilin Academy of Agricultural Science/Northeast Agricultural Research Center of China, Changchun, 130033, China.
Hongxiang ZhaoInstitute of Agricultural Resources and Environment Research, Jilin Academy of Agricultural Science/Northeast Agricultural Research Center of China, Changchun, 130033, China. hxzhao@cjaas.com.
Yanchun FengInstitute of Agricultural Economics and Information, Jilin Academy of Agricultural Science/Northeast Agricultural Research Center of China, Changchun, 130033, China. fengyanchun@cjaas.com.
Guobo TanInstitute of Agricultural Resources and Environment Research, Jilin Academy of Agricultural Science/Northeast Agricultural Research Center of China, Changchun, 130033, China.
Shaofeng BianInstitute of Agricultural Resources and Environment Research, Jilin Academy of Agricultural Science/Northeast Agricultural Research Center of China, Changchun, 130033, China.

Funding

Jilin Province Science and Technology Development Plan Project 20220302006NCJilin Province Science and Technology Development Plan Project 20230101227JC
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Returning straw to the field can increase soil organic matter content, improve soil physical and chemical properties, enhance soil biological activity, and thus improve soil fertility. However, returning straw to the field has problems such as slow decomposition rate and delayed nutrient release. Reasonable water management is one of the important measures to improve the effectiveness of returning maize straw to the field. To explore soil moisture management measures suitable for maize straw decomposition, nitrogen release, maize yield increase, and efficient water utilization, a 2-year study was conducted in a movable rain shelter. Set three irrigation quotas, namely 200 mm, 350 mm, and 500 mm (represented by I 200, I 350, and I 500), and two straw return methods, straw returning and not returning to the field were represented by SR and CK, respectively. The experimental results showed that the decomposition rate and nitrogen release rate of I 350 were significantly greater than those under the other irrigation treatments. There was no significant difference in plant nitrogen uptake or maize yield between I 350 and I 500, but the values were significantly greater than those in I 200. The water use efficiency of I 350 treatment group was significantly greater than that of I 500 treatment group. Returning straw to the field has only a compensatory effect on the nitrogen uptake and transport of plants under some low irrigation levels. Under these experimental conditions, I 350 was more conducive to straw decomposition, straw nitrogen release, maize nitrogen uptake, maize yield increase, and efficient water use. This study can provide a theoretical reference for soil moisture management under straw return conditions in semi-arid areas of Jilin Province, China.

Indexed as

Agricultural IrrigationNitrogenZea maysPlant StemsSoilWaterNitrogenSoilWaterIrrigation quotaMaize absorbs nitrogenNitrogen releaseStraw decompositionWater use efficiencyYield

Identifiers

PMID39979359
PMCPMC11842709

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.