ArticleScientific reports2025
Response coupling with an auxiliary neural signal for enhancing brain signal detection.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) offer an implicit, non-linguistic communication channel between users and machines. Despite their potential, BCIs are far from becoming a mainstream communication modality like text and speech. While non-invasive BCIs, such as Electroencephalography, are favored for their ease of use, their broader adoption is limited by challenges related to signal noise, artifacts, and variability across users. In this paper, we propose a novel method called response coupling, aimed at enhancing brain signal detection and reliability by pairing a brain signal with an artificially induced auxiliary signal and leveraging their interaction. Specifically, we use error-related potentials (ErrPs) as the primary signal and steady-state visual evoked potentials (SSVEPs) as the auxiliary signal. SSVEPs, known for their phase-locked responses to rhythmic stimuli, are selected because rhythmic neural activity plays a critical role in sensory and cognitive processes, with evidence suggesting that reinforcing these oscillations can improve neural performance. By exploring the interaction between these two signals, we demonstrate that response coupling significantly improves the detection accuracy of ErrPs, especially in the parietal and occipital regions. This method introduces a new paradigm for enhancing BCI performance, where the interaction between a primary and an auxiliary signal is harnessed to enhance the detection performance. Additionally, the phase-locking properties of SSVEPs allow for unsupervised rejection of suboptimal data, further increasing BCI reliability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.