Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39979301›Full record

ArticleNature communications2025

Expanding protected area coverage for migratory birds could improve long-term population trends.

Jennifer A Border, James W Pearce-Higgins, Chris M Hewson, Christine Howard, Philip A Stephens, Stephen G Willis, Richard A Fuller, Jeffrey O Hanson, Henk Sierdsema, Ruud P B Foppen and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Jennifer A BorderBritish Trust for Ornithology, The Nunnery, Thetford, UK. jennifer.border@bto.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9481-6809
James W Pearce-HigginsBritish Trust for Ornithology, The Nunnery, Thetford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1341-5080
Chris M HewsonBritish Trust for Ornithology, The Nunnery, Thetford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8493-5203
Christine HowardConservation Ecology Group, Department of Biosciences, Durham University, Durham, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7514-9721
Philip A StephensConservation Ecology Group, Department of Biosciences, Durham University, Durham, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5849-788X
Stephen G WillisConservation Ecology Group, Department of Biosciences, Durham University, Durham, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8656-5808
Richard A FullerSchool of the Environment, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9468-9678
Jeffrey O HansonDepartment of Biology, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4716-6134
Henk SierdsemaSovon Dutch Centre for Field Ornithology, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Ruud P B FoppenRadboud Institute for Biological and Environmental Sciences (RIBES), Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Lluís BrotonsCSIC, Cerdanyola del Vallès, Spain.
Gabriel GargalloCatalan Ornithological Institute (ICO), Barcelona, Spain.
Daniel FinkCornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca, NY, USA.
Stephen R BaillieBritish Trust for Ornithology, The Nunnery, Thetford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5126-9470

Funding

RCUK | Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) NE/T001038/1RCUK | Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) NE/T001070/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Populations of many migratory taxa have been declining over recent decades. Although protected areas are a cornerstone for conservation, their role in protecting migratory species can be incomplete due to the dynamic distributions of these species. Here, we use a pan-European citizen science bird occurrence dataset (EurobirdPortal) with Spatiotemporal Exploratory Modelling to assess how the weekly distributions of 30 passerine and near passerine species overlap with protected areas in Europe and compare this to range adjusted policy protection targets. Thirteen of our 30 species were inadequately covered by protected areas for some, or all, of the European part of their annual cycle under a target based on the 2020 Convention on Biodiversity framework and none were adequately covered under a target based on the 2030 Convention on Biodiversity framework. Species associated with farmland had the lowest percentage of their weekly distribution protected. The percentage of a species' distribution within protected areas was positively correlated with its long-term population trend, even after accounting for confounding factors, suggesting a positive influence of protected areas on long-term trends. This emphasises the positive contribution that an informed expansion of the European protected area system could play for the future conservation of migratory land birds.

Indexed as

Animal MigrationBirdsConservation of Natural ResourcesAnimalsBiodiversityEuropePopulation Dynamics

Identifiers

PMID39979301
PMCPMC11842860

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.