Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39979260›Full record

ArticleNature communications2025

Chimpanzees adapt their exploration to key properties of the environment.

Lou M Haux, Jan M Engelmann, Esther Herrmann, Ralph Hertwig

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lou M HauxCenter for Adaptive Rationality, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin, Germany. haux@mpib-berlin.mpg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6660-3945
Jan M EngelmannDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Esther Herrmann *School of Psychology, Sport and Health Sciences, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6791-0805
Ralph Hertwig *Center for Adaptive Rationality, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9908-9556

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Exploration is an important strategy for reducing the uncertainty that pervades daily life. Yet the evolutionary roots of adaptive exploration are poorly understood. We harness and adapt the human decisions-from-experience paradigm to investigate exploration under uncertainty in chimpanzees. In our study, chimpanzees (N = 15; eight females) are simultaneously confronted with an uncertain option (with outcome variance) and a safe option (without outcome variance) and tested in both stable and changing environments. Results reveal that, as in human exploration, how and how much chimpanzees explore depends on the environment. One key environmental property is change: Chimpanzees explore more across trials in changing than in stable conditions. Consistent with the assumption of classic economic models that variance indicates risk, chimpanzees also explore more when they experience variance in the options' outcomes. Individual risk and uncertainty preferences did not have a statistically significant effect on exploratory efforts. These findings suggest that chimpanzees and humans share key similarities in the way they respond to risk and uncertainty.

Indexed as

Behavior, AnimalEnvironmentPan troglodytesAnimalsFemaleHumansMaleUncertainty

Identifiers

PMID39979260
PMCPMC11842718

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.