ArticleNature communications2025
High throughput analysis of rare nanoparticles with deep-enhanced sensitivity via unsupervised denoising.
Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence models: transforming early diagnosis and precise treatment of gastrointestinal cancers.Molecular cancer · 2026Review
- Advances in nanotechnology for early cancer diagnosis: emerging nanoplatforms and multimodal imaging approaches.American journal of cancer research · 2026Review
- High throughput analysis of rare nanoparticles with deep-enhanced sensitivity via unsupervised denoising.Nature communications · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The large-scale multiparametric analysis of individual nanoparticles is increasingly vital in the diverse fields of biology, medicine, and materials science. However, the current methods struggle with the tradeoff between measurement scalability and sensitivity, especially when identifying rare nanoparticles in heterogeneous mixtures. By developing and combining an unsupervised deep learning-based denoising method and an optofluidic device tuned for nanoparticle detection, we realize a nanoparticle analyzer that simultaneously achieves high scalability, throughput, and sensitivity levels; we name this approach "Deep Nanometry" (DNM). DNM detects polystyrene beads with a detection of limit of 30 nm at a throughput of over 100,000 events/second. The sensitive and scalable DNM directly detects rare target extracellular vesicles (EVs) in non-purified serum, making up as little as 0.002% of the 1,214,392 total particles. Moreover, DNM accurately and sufficiently counts diagnostic marker EVs present in only 0.93% and 0.17% of particle detections in sera of colorectal cancer patients and healthy controls, demonstrating its potential application to the early detection of colorectal cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.