Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39979231›Full record

ArticleActa anaesthesiologica Scandinavica2025

Avoidance versus use of neuromuscular blocking agents for optimizing video laryngoscopy-assisted tracheal intubation: A protocol for a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.

Andreas Creutzburg, Anders Kehlet Nørskov, Michelle Icka Christensen, Arash Afshari, Lars Hyldborg Lundstrøm, Louise Bill, Helene Korvenius Nedergaard, Matias Vested

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Andreas CreutzburgDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Operation and Trauma Center, Center of Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-3954-8634
Anders Kehlet NørskovDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Nordsjællands Hospital, Hillerød, Denmark.
Michelle Icka ChristensenDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Operation and Trauma Center, Center of Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0009-0001-1940-2590
Arash AfshariDepartment of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Lars Hyldborg LundstrømDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Nordsjællands Hospital, Hillerød, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-2179-1433
Louise BillCollaboration for Evidence-based Practice and Research in Anaesthesia (CEPRA), Copenhagen, Denmark.
Helene Korvenius NedergaardCollaboration for Evidence-based Practice and Research in Anaesthesia (CEPRA), Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-5988-4563
Matias VestedDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Operation and Trauma Center, Center of Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBoth the European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care and the Difficult Airway Society recommend the use of neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs) to facilitate tracheal intubation and to reduce the risk of complications. Even though it is recommended to use video laryngoscopy for intubation, especially in circumstances where difficult tracheal intubation is expected, the evidence for the combination of video laryngoscopy and NMBAs is sparse. This protocol outlines a systematic review of the effect of avoidance versus use of NMBAs for tracheal intubation during video laryngoscopy in adults.

methodsThis protocol is made in accordance with reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses protocols recommendations. We intent to include randomised controlled trials assessing the effect of avoidance versus use of NMBAs during video laryngoscopy to facilitate tracheal intubation (either nasal or oral) in the adult population. The primary outcome is failed first-pass intubation. Our secondary outcomes include adverse and serious adverse events. A thorough search will be done to identify relevant trials, including CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, BIOSIS, Web of Science and CIHNAL. Furthermore, trial registries will be searched for unpublished trials. Each trial will be evaluated for bias. We will use appropriate packages in R to perform the meta-analysis. Additionally, we will perform trial sequential analysis on the meta-analysis of our primary outcome. Lastly, we will employ the GRADE approach and create "Summary of Findings" tables.

Indexed as

Intubation, IntratrachealLaryngoscopyNeuromuscular Blocking AgentsVideo-Assisted Techniques and ProceduresAdultHumansMeta-Analysis as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSystematic Reviews as TopicNeuromuscular Blocking Agentsneuromuscular blocking agentstracheal intubationvideo laryngoscopy

Identifiers

PMID39979231
PMCPMC11842299

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.