Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39979058›Full record

SynthesisBMJ open2025

Effectiveness of clinical healthcare interventions for enhancing the work participation of patients with various health conditions: a synthesis of systematic reviews.

Lana Kluit, Jan L Hoving, Faridi S Jamaludin, Coen A M van Bennekom, Annechien Beumer, Angela G E M de Boer, Astrid de Wind

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lana KluitPublic and Occupational Health, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands l.kluit@amsterdamumc.nl a.dewind@amsterdamumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-3981-6871
Jan L HovingPublic and Occupational Health, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Faridi S JamaludinMedical Library AMC, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Coen A M van BennekomPublic and Occupational Health, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Annechien BeumerPublic and Occupational Health, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Angela G E M de BoerPublic and Occupational Health, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Astrid de WindPublic and Occupational Health, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands l.kluit@amsterdamumc.nl a.dewind@amsterdamumc.nl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis objectives of this study were to determine the effectiveness of clinical healthcare interventions designed for improving the work participation of patients with various health conditions and identify promising elements within these interventions.

designA systematic literature search was conducted, and a synthesis of systematic reviews (SRs) was performed. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library and CINAHL were searched for articles published from January 2012 to December 2023. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: SRs of randomised controlled trials evaluating the effectiveness of interventions that aimed at improving work participation initiated within clinical healthcare in patients being treated for various health conditions were included. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Two authors independently used standardised methods to search and select SRs, and extract data. Our primary outcome was work participation, which could include return-to-work rate or sick leave duration. We were interested in both short-, medium-, as well as long-term outcomes. Risk of bias was assessed using the AMSTAR-2 tool. We used Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) to evaluate the certainty of the evidence and findings were summarised in GRADE evidence profiles. We used a deductive synthesis to identify promising intervention elements.

resultsThe health conditions included in the selected SRs were cancer, chronic low back and musculoskeletal pain, coronary heart disease, inflammatory arthritis, complaints of the lumbopelvic region during pregnancy, stroke and traumatic brain injury. Across health conditions, many interventions trended towards small, favourable effects. Moderately certain evidence showed that multidisciplinary and physical interventions enhance work participation at 12 months for people with cancer (risk ratio (RR) 1.23, 95% CI 1.09 to 1.33 and RR 1.23, 95% CI 1.08 to 1.39, respectively), and that multidisciplinary interventions reduce the days of return to work compared with usual care for people with coronary heart disease (40.77 days lower than control, 95% CI -67.19 to -14.35). Low-certainty evidence suggested that multidisciplinary interventions may enhance work participation at 12 months for people with coronary heart disease (RR 1.56, 95% CI 1.23 to 1.98) and reduce the number of sick leave days at 12 months for people with chronic low back pain (82, IQR 51 to 164 vs 175, IQR 91 to 365; p=0.003). Promising elements included (psycho)education, cognitive-behavioural therapy, psychosocial support, group and vocational counselling and physical training.

conclusionsThere is considerable overlap in clinical healthcare interventions that aim to enhance work participation for patients across health conditions. Although their effects on work participation vary, some conditions show favourable response to multidisciplinary interventions. More evidence is needed on developing tailored interventions and evaluating their cost-effectiveness. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42022346552.

Indexed as

Return to WorkSick LeaveCoronary DiseaseHumansNeoplasmsSystematic Reviews as TopicClinical Decision-MakingDelivery of Health Care, IntegratedOccupational Health ServicesPatient-Centred CareSystematic Review

Identifiers

PMID39979058
PMCPMC11843017

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.