SynthesisBMJ open2025
Effectiveness of clinical healthcare interventions for enhancing the work participation of patients with various health conditions: a synthesis of systematic reviews.
Synthesis in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Impact of Psychosocial Aspects as Risk Factors for Long-Term Illnesses in General Practice: Protocol for a Scoping Review.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
- Associations between work ability and work participation after rehabilitation: a longitudinal multicentre cohort study.EULAR rheumatology open · 2026Article
- Stakeholder Perspectives on Cancer Survivors' Return to Work and Well-Being: Qualitative Interview Study.JMIR cancer · 2026Article
- A scoping review on information and support needs regarding cancer and work: part II-needs of employers and professionals in supporting cancer survivors.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2026Review
- Article
- Rehabilitation for People with Inflammatory Arthritis: Meeting the Challenges of a Changing Healthcare Landscape.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis objectives of this study were to determine the effectiveness of clinical healthcare interventions designed for improving the work participation of patients with various health conditions and identify promising elements within these interventions.
designA systematic literature search was conducted, and a synthesis of systematic reviews (SRs) was performed. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library and CINAHL were searched for articles published from January 2012 to December 2023. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: SRs of randomised controlled trials evaluating the effectiveness of interventions that aimed at improving work participation initiated within clinical healthcare in patients being treated for various health conditions were included. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Two authors independently used standardised methods to search and select SRs, and extract data. Our primary outcome was work participation, which could include return-to-work rate or sick leave duration. We were interested in both short-, medium-, as well as long-term outcomes. Risk of bias was assessed using the AMSTAR-2 tool. We used Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) to evaluate the certainty of the evidence and findings were summarised in GRADE evidence profiles. We used a deductive synthesis to identify promising intervention elements.
resultsThe health conditions included in the selected SRs were cancer, chronic low back and musculoskeletal pain, coronary heart disease, inflammatory arthritis, complaints of the lumbopelvic region during pregnancy, stroke and traumatic brain injury. Across health conditions, many interventions trended towards small, favourable effects. Moderately certain evidence showed that multidisciplinary and physical interventions enhance work participation at 12 months for people with cancer (risk ratio (RR) 1.23, 95% CI 1.09 to 1.33 and RR 1.23, 95% CI 1.08 to 1.39, respectively), and that multidisciplinary interventions reduce the days of return to work compared with usual care for people with coronary heart disease (40.77 days lower than control, 95% CI -67.19 to -14.35). Low-certainty evidence suggested that multidisciplinary interventions may enhance work participation at 12 months for people with coronary heart disease (RR 1.56, 95% CI 1.23 to 1.98) and reduce the number of sick leave days at 12 months for people with chronic low back pain (82, IQR 51 to 164 vs 175, IQR 91 to 365; p=0.003). Promising elements included (psycho)education, cognitive-behavioural therapy, psychosocial support, group and vocational counselling and physical training.
conclusionsThere is considerable overlap in clinical healthcare interventions that aim to enhance work participation for patients across health conditions. Although their effects on work participation vary, some conditions show favourable response to multidisciplinary interventions. More evidence is needed on developing tailored interventions and evaluating their cost-effectiveness. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42022346552.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.