Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39979044›Full record

SynthesisBMJ open2025

Health impacts of the Sure Start programme on disadvantaged children in the UK: a systematic review.

Jatinder Hayre, Helen Pearce, Raj Khera, Amy Dehn Lunn, John Alexander Ford

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Editorial Perspective: Overdiagnosis of ADHD? Here we go again.Child and adolescent mental health · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jatinder HayreWolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK Jatinder.hayre1@nhs.net.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0473-686X
Helen PearceWolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Raj KheraUniversity of Liverpool School of Medicine, Liverpool, UK.
Amy Dehn LunnWolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
John Alexander FordWolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesWith rising poverty and widening health inequity among children in the UK, the objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of the Sure Start programme on child health outcomes in disadvantaged children.

designSystematic review. DATA SOURCES: We conducted a comprehensive search of three databases: Embase, Medline and Social Policy and Practice, with grey literature searched using Open Grey, Social Care Online and Google Scholar. The search was conducted in January 2024. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES: All primary studies investigating health outcomes in children as a result of Sure Start intervention were eligible for inclusion, without limitations on study design. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Full-text articles in English were independently screened according to the eligibility criteria by two researchers. Results were synthesised and presented in both a quantitative and narrative format. We assessed the risk of bias in each included study.

resultsOur initial search identified 585 records, of which 9 met our inclusion criteria with a further 3 grey literature reports included. Three themes were identified: physical health, social functioning and neurodevelopmental disorders. In terms of physical health, our findings indicate significant reductions in hospitalisations in older children, accidental injury and obesity prevalence. Furthermore, Sure Start increased the prevalence of breastfeeding and improved dental hygiene in children. In the social functioning domain, the Sure Start programme produced mixed findings: with children from certain backgrounds observing adverse effects as a result of the intervention. Yet, Sure Start demonstrated significant improvement in education attainment, with a maximal improvement of grade improvement in children from low socio-economic and ethnic minority backgrounds. For neurodevelopmental disorders, Sure Start was able to significantly improve conduct disorder and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder symptomatology with long-term clinical stabilisation, as well as improving screening rates for developmental disorders.

conclusionThis study examines the evidence of the Sure Start programme, as an example of an early-years community-based intervention, to mitigate health inequity among disadvantaged children. The findings suggest the Sure Start programme to be effective in health generation across the domains of physical health and neurodevelopmental disorders for disadvantaged children, but with mixed findings for social development that can only partially be explained by methodological flaws. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: PROSPERO CRD42024503234.

Indexed as

Child HealthVulnerable PopulationsChildChild, PreschoolHumansPovertyProgram EvaluationUnited KingdomAdolescentCommunity child healthHealthHealth EquityPUBLIC HEALTHSOCIAL MEDICINE

Identifiers

PMID39979044
PMCPMC11842985

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.