ArticleBMJ open2025
Effectiveness of pain neuroscience education, motivational interviewing and cognition targeted exercise therapy in patients with chronic neck pain: protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial (the COGMO-AP study).
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05785455 (Efficacy Of Pain Neuroscience Communication, Motivational Interviewing And Cognitive Exercise Therapy In Patients With Chronic Neck Pain), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Efficacy Of Pain Neuroscience Communication, Motivational Interviewing And Cognitive Exercise Therapy In Patients With Chronic Neck Pain
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionIn primary care, the prevalence of neck pain has increased substantially. Evidence regarding treatment of chronic neck pain (CNP) is scarce, and its effectiveness is not entirely proven in different stages of chronicity, nor for different types of cervical disorders. The goal of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of a complex intervention (COGMO intervention) compared with usual practice in primary care physiotherapy to improve neck pain intensity, severity and disability in patients with CNP. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Design: a pragmatic cluster-randomised clinical trial design with a 12-month follow-up.
settingprimary care.
participantsphysiotherapists as randomisation unit, and patients as analysis unit. INCLUSION CRITERIA: individuals aged 18 to 65 years suffering from moderate to severe CNP. Sample size expected: 142 patients. Recruitment: patients referred from primary care physicians to physiotherapy.
interventionpain neuroscience education (PNE), motivational interviewing (MI) and cognition targeted exercise therapy (CTE) compared with the standard treatment in primary care. OUTCOMES: the main variable is reduction in pain intensity; secondary variables include pain severity, conditioned pain modulation, temporal summation, neck disability, fear/avoidance behaviour, kinesiophobia, catastrophising, therapeutic alliance and quality of life. Sociodemographic information and adherence to the intervention will be recorded. DATA COLLECTION: baseline, and follow-up at 3, 6 and 12 months. ANALYSIS: it will follow intention-to-treat principles, and difference in percentage of subjects achieving success on the primary endpoint at 12 months. A model with multilevel analysis will be adjusted through logistic regression (being the dependent variable pain intensity, and the independent, the intervention). ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval has been awarded by the Regional Ethics Committee of Madrid (code: COGMO-AP) and the primary health care central commission of research (code: 20210011). The results of the study will be disseminated through international peer-reviewed journals, international conferences, press and social media. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05785455.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.