ArticleClinical and translational allergy2025
Aeroallergen sensitivity patterns in Gulf countries: A systematic review.
Article in Clinical and translational allergy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trends in Aeroallergen IgE Sensitization in Jordan: A Decade-Long Observational Study.Immunity, inflammation and disease · 2026Observational
- House dust mites in three contrasting climatic regions of Saudi Arabia.Experimental & applied acarology · 2026Article
- Improving Diagnostic Accuracy in Respiratory Allergy: Monocentric Reevaluation of the GAClinical and translational allergy · 2025Article
- Molecular Signatures of Aeroallergen Sensitization in Pediatric Populations: A Comparative Study Across Spanish Cities.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Aeroallergen sensitivity patterns in Gulf countries: A systematic review.Clinical and translational allergy · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSuccessful management of allergic diseases necessitates accurate diagnosis, implementation of appropriate allergen avoidance techniques, and medical therapies. However, data availability regarding aeroallergens in the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries is limited.
methodsWe conducted a systematic review of studies conducted in Gulf countries on individuals diagnosed with or tested for aeroallergen sensitivities, focusing on prevalence and respiratory health impacts. The search strategy followed the PRISMA guidelines and was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar from inception to November 12, 2023.
resultsA total of 27 studies, both adult and pediatric, were included in this systematic review. Aeroallergen sensitization was assessed using skin prick testing (SPT) in 15 studies; 5 used in vitro methods, 2 employed both, 4 relied on self-reports, and 1 on aerobiological monitoring. Sensitization rates varied considerably, influenced by factors such as age, demographics, and location. Sensitization was noted to allergens shared with Western populations, and to those native to the region for example, house dust mite sensitization ranged from 15% to 78%, Salsola from 13% to 78%. Up to 65.1% of allergen-positive individuals demonstrated polysensitization. Sensitization patterns differed between indigenous populations and expatriates, with local allergens being more prevalent among natives. Sensitization rates were lower in younger children but increased with age.
conclusionOur systematic review highlights the crucial importance of providing allergen-sensitivity information that is specifically tailored to the local environment. This tailored approach can improve clinical diagnosis, enable appropriate allergen avoidance and immunotherapy strategies, and result in potential cost savings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.