Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39978566›Full record

ArticleExperimental neurology2025

Neuronal mechanisms underlying activation of locomotor network by epidural electrical stimulation of the spinal cord.

Pavel E Musienko, Pavel V Zelenin, Vladimir F Lyalka, Polina Yu Shkorbatova, Oleg V Gorskii, Tatiana G Deliagina

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Pavel E MusienkoLaboratory of Neuroprosthetics, Institute of Translational Biomedicine, St. Petersburg State University, 199034 St. Petersburg, Russia; Department of Neuroscience, Sirius University of Science and Technology, 354340 Sirius, Russia; Federal Center of Brain Research and Neurotechnologies, 199330 Moscow, Russia.
Pavel V ZeleninDepartment of Neuroscience, Karolinska Institute, SE-17177 Stockholm, Sweden.
Vladimir F LyalkaDepartment of Neuroscience, Karolinska Institute, SE-17177 Stockholm, Sweden.
Polina Yu ShkorbatovaLaboratory of Neuroprosthetics, Institute of Translational Biomedicine, St. Petersburg State University, 199034 St. Petersburg, Russia; Pavlov Institute of Physiology, 199034 St. Petersburg, Russia.
Oleg V GorskiiLaboratory of Neuroprosthetics, Institute of Translational Biomedicine, St. Petersburg State University, 199034 St. Petersburg, Russia; Pavlov Institute of Physiology, 199034 St. Petersburg, Russia; Life Improvement by Future Technologies Center, 143025 Moscow, Russia.
Tatiana G DeliaginaDepartment of Neuroscience, Karolinska Institute, SE-17177 Stockholm, Sweden. Electronic address: Tatiana.Deliagina@ki.se.

Funding

Restoration of Postural Control After Spinal Cord InjuryR01NS064964 · NINDS · KAROLINSKA INSTITUTE · PI DELIAGINA, TATIANA G · 2011 to 2025
$2.6M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS064964
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Epidural electrical stimulation of the spinal cord (ES) is used to restore/improve locomotor movements in patients. However, the neuronal mechanisms underlying activation of locomotor networks by ES are unknown. Here, we analyzed the effects of ES on the activity of individual spinal neurons of different functional locomotor groups. Neuronal activity was recorded in decerebrate cats before and during ES that evoked locomotion. During ES initial period (NW-period, before the locomotion onset), the activity was increased in most neurons as compared to that before ES. We found that ES-caused activation of neurons of locomotor network to the average level similar to that observed during locomotion is not sufficient for initiation of locomotion. We demonstrated that the onset of ES-evoked locomotion was associated with specific changes in the activity of individual neurons within functional locomotor groups and in their responses to epidural stimuli. With the locomotion onset, there was a trend for individual neurons with extremely high activity during NW-period to decrease their activity, while for neurons with extremely low activity to become more active. Also, in neurons contributing to generation of a specific mode of locomotion, peaks and troughs in responses to individual epidural stimuli were significantly less pronounced as compared with those observed during NW-period. We suggest that these changes allow ES to maintain the high level of excitability of the locomotor network necessary for its operation without distortion of the locomotor rhythm. The obtained results advance our understanding of the neuronal mechanisms underlying activation of locomotor network by ES.

Indexed as

LocomotionNerve NetNeuronsSpinal CordSpinal Cord StimulationAction PotentialsAnimalsCatsDecerebrate StateElectric StimulationEpidural SpaceFemaleDecerebrate catEpidural stimulationLocomotionSpinal neurons

Identifiers

PMID39978566
PMCPMC12100513

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.