Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39978147›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage. Clinical2025

Post-stroke changes in brain structure and function can both influence acute upper limb function and subsequent recovery.

Catharina Zich, Nick S Ward, Nina Forss, Sven Bestmann, Andrew J Quinn, Eeva Karhunen, Kristina Laaksonen

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage. Clinical, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07150325 (Integration of Force Control Training and Mirror Visual Feedback on Stroke Patients on Brain Activation and Hand Function), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07150325 nacompletednot on this map

Integration of Force Control Training and Mirror Visual Feedback on Stroke Patients on Brain Activation and Hand Function

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational Cheng-Kung University HospitalRan2024 to 2025Enrolled5ConditionsStroke, Stroke PatientsArmsTIPr, Mirror Visual Feedback Device, Mirror Visual Feedback Device(Blocked mirror)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Catharina ZichDepartment of Clinical and Movement Neuroscience, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, United Kingdom; Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, FMRIB, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, United Kingdom; Medical Research Council Brain Network Dynamics Unit, University of Oxford, United Kingdom. Electronic address: c.zich@ucl.ac.uk.
Nick S WardDepartment of Clinical and Movement Neuroscience, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, United Kingdom.
Nina ForssDepartment of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, Aalto University School of Science, Espoo, Finland; Neurocenter, Helsinki University Hospital and Clinical Neurosciences, Neurology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Sven BestmannDepartment of Clinical and Movement Neuroscience, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, United Kingdom; Department of Imaging Neuroscience, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, United Kingdom.
Andrew J QuinnCentre for Human Brain Health, School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Eeva KarhunenDepartment of Neurology, Helsinki University Hospital and Clinical Neurosciences, Neurology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Kristina LaaksonenDepartment of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, Aalto University School of Science, Espoo, Finland; Department of Neurology, Helsinki University Hospital and Clinical Neurosciences, Neurology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.

Funding

Wellcome Trust 203147/Z/16/ZWellcome Trust 224430/Z/21/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Improving outcomes after stroke depends on understanding both the causes of initial function/impairment and the mechanisms of recovery. Recovery in patients with initially low function/high impairment is variable, suggesting the factors relating to initial function/impairment are different to the factors important for subsequent recovery. Here we aimed to determine the contribution of altered brain structure and function to initial severity and subsequent recovery of the upper limb post-stroke. The Nine-Hole Peg Test was recorded in week 1 and one-month post-stroke and used to divide 36 stroke patients (18 females, age: M = 66.56 years) into those with high/low initial function and high/low subsequent recovery. We determined differences in week 1 brain structure (Magnetic Resonance Imaging) and function (Magnetoencephalography, tactile stimulation) between high/low patients for both initial function and subsequent recovery. Lastly, we examined the relative contribution of changes in brain structure and function to recovery in patients with low levels of initial function. Low initial function and low subsequent recovery are related to lower sensorimotor β power and greater lesion-induced disconnection of contralateral [ipsilesional] white-matter motor projection connections. Moreover, differences in intra-hemispheric connectivity (structural and functional) are unique to initial motor function, while differences in inter-hemispheric connectivity (structural and functional) are unique to subsequent motor recovery. Function-related and recovery-related differences in brain function and structure after stroke are related, yet not identical. Separating out the factors that contribute to each process is key to identifying potential therapeutic targets for improving outcomes.

Indexed as

BrainRecovery of FunctionStrokeUpper ExtremityAgedFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedStroke RehabilitationAcute strokeMEGMRIRecoverySensorimotor system

Identifiers

PMID39978147
PMCPMC11889610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.