ArticleInternational journal of language & communication disorders
Oesophageal screening in videofluoroscopic swallow studies: Perspectives from the multidisciplinary dysphagia team to refine the clinical pathway.
Article in International journal of language & communication disorders. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Role of Video Fluoroscopic Swallow Study as a Screening Tool for Esophageal Dysmotility: A Call for More Widespread Implementation of a Standardized Esophageal Sweep Protocol.Gastro hep advances · 2026Review
- Risk factors for dysphagia after stroke and efficacy evaluation of swallowing function training.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025Article
- Oesophageal screening in videofluoroscopic swallow studies: Perspectives from the multidisciplinary dysphagia team to refine the clinical pathway.International journal of language & communication disordersArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundVideofluoroscopic swallow studies (VFSS) are multidisciplinary swallowing assessments led by speech-language therapists (SLTs). The purpose of oesophageal screening in VFSS is to guide further diagnostic assessment and treatment of possible oesophageal abnormalities. Yet, internationally standard protocols and clinical pathways for oesophageal screening in VFSS have not been established. AIM(S): The aim of this study was to refine and optimise oesophageal screening in VFSS at one Australian metropolitan hospital by incorporating expertise of the multidisciplinary dysphagia team. METHODS AND PROCEDURES: Focus groups/semi-structured interviews were conducted with SLTs, radiologists (RADs), gastroenterologists (GEs), referring medical officers (MEDs) and medical radiation technicians (MRTs, also known as radiographers) working in VFSS. Interview questions explored oesophageal screening approaches, interpretation and reporting practices, GE referral criteria and clinical recommendations. Data were analysed via qualitative content analysis to determine meaning units, sub-categories, and categories. OUTCOMES AND
resultsTwenty-six health professionals were interviewed (n = 8 SLTs, n = 6 RADs, n = 5 MEDs, n = 4 MRTs, n = 3 GEs). Four categories were identified: (1) oesophageal screening in VFSS adds clinical information but has limitations; (2) specific knowledge, skills and organisational factors are needed to optimise oesophageal screening, including in procedure, interpretation, reporting, GE referral pathway and intervention selection; (3) multidisciplinary consensus is needed regarding normal versus abnormal oesophageal transit and GE referral criteria; and (4) patient context, preferences and reported symptoms should primarily guide dysphagia decision-making. Each category had several component subcategories. The local clinical pathway (also known as care pathway or care map) for oesophageal screening in VFSS was refined by incorporating multidisciplinary dysphagia team expertise. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: There was a willingness from the multidisciplinary dysphagia team to refine the local clinical pathway for oesophageal screening in VFSS. Detailed clinical pathways that guide workflow and decision-making should be considered when introducing oesophageal screening into VFSS protocols. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS: What is already known on the subject Despite the recognised benefits of including oesophageal screening in VFSS, there has been limited uptake of oesophageal screening protocols internationally. Implementation research is needed that supports clinicians to embed oesophageal screening into routine VFSS practice. What this study adds This is the first published study that explores in-depth the perspectives of the multidisciplinary dysphagia team regarding oesophageal screening in VFSS. What are the clinical implications of this work? This study proposes a clinical pathway refined by the multidisciplinary dysphagia team to support clinicians in embedding oesophageal screening and its findings into routine dysphagia practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.