Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39977716›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of language & communication disorders

Oesophageal screening in videofluoroscopic swallow studies: Perspectives from the multidisciplinary dysphagia team to refine the clinical pathway.

Kellie McCarthy, Emma Finch, Anna Miles

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of language & communication disorders. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Risk factors for dysphagia after stroke and efficacy evaluation of swallowing function training.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kellie McCarthySchool of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7241-450X
Emma FinchSchool of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9690-8165
Anna MilesSchool of Psychology, Faculty of Science, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3260-5824

Funding

This research was supported by an Australian Government Research Training Program (RTP) Scholarship.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVideofluoroscopic swallow studies (VFSS) are multidisciplinary swallowing assessments led by speech-language therapists (SLTs). The purpose of oesophageal screening in VFSS is to guide further diagnostic assessment and treatment of possible oesophageal abnormalities. Yet, internationally standard protocols and clinical pathways for oesophageal screening in VFSS have not been established. AIM(S): The aim of this study was to refine and optimise oesophageal screening in VFSS at one Australian metropolitan hospital by incorporating expertise of the multidisciplinary dysphagia team. METHODS AND PROCEDURES: Focus groups/semi-structured interviews were conducted with SLTs, radiologists (RADs), gastroenterologists (GEs), referring medical officers (MEDs) and medical radiation technicians (MRTs, also known as radiographers) working in VFSS. Interview questions explored oesophageal screening approaches, interpretation and reporting practices, GE referral criteria and clinical recommendations. Data were analysed via qualitative content analysis to determine meaning units, sub-categories, and categories. OUTCOMES AND

resultsTwenty-six health professionals were interviewed (n = 8 SLTs, n = 6 RADs, n = 5 MEDs, n = 4 MRTs, n = 3 GEs). Four categories were identified: (1) oesophageal screening in VFSS adds clinical information but has limitations; (2) specific knowledge, skills and organisational factors are needed to optimise oesophageal screening, including in procedure, interpretation, reporting, GE referral pathway and intervention selection; (3) multidisciplinary consensus is needed regarding normal versus abnormal oesophageal transit and GE referral criteria; and (4) patient context, preferences and reported symptoms should primarily guide dysphagia decision-making. Each category had several component subcategories. The local clinical pathway (also known as care pathway or care map) for oesophageal screening in VFSS was refined by incorporating multidisciplinary dysphagia team expertise. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: There was a willingness from the multidisciplinary dysphagia team to refine the local clinical pathway for oesophageal screening in VFSS. Detailed clinical pathways that guide workflow and decision-making should be considered when introducing oesophageal screening into VFSS protocols. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS: What is already known on the subject Despite the recognised benefits of including oesophageal screening in VFSS, there has been limited uptake of oesophageal screening protocols internationally. Implementation research is needed that supports clinicians to embed oesophageal screening into routine VFSS practice. What this study adds This is the first published study that explores in-depth the perspectives of the multidisciplinary dysphagia team regarding oesophageal screening in VFSS. What are the clinical implications of this work? This study proposes a clinical pathway refined by the multidisciplinary dysphagia team to support clinicians in embedding oesophageal screening and its findings into routine dysphagia practice.

Indexed as

Critical PathwaysDeglutition DisordersEsophagusPatient Care TeamAustraliaDeglutitionFemaleFluoroscopyFocus GroupsHumansMaleSpeech-Language PathologyVideo Recordingclinical pathwaydysphagiamultidisciplinaryoesophageal screeningVFSS

Identifiers

PMID39977716
PMCPMC11842011

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.