Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39977449›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Evaluating patient experience in maternity services using a Bayesian belief network model.

Abrar Abdulhakim Ahmed Munassar, Mecit Can Emre Simsekler, Ahmed Alaaeldin Saad, Abroon Qazi, Mohammed A Omar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Abrar Abdulhakim Ahmed MunassarDepartment of Management Science & Engineering, Khalifa University of Science & Technology, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
Mecit Can Emre SimseklerDepartment of Management Science & Engineering, Khalifa University of Science & Technology, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1555-5012
Ahmed Alaaeldin SaadDepartment of Management Science & Engineering, Khalifa University of Science & Technology, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
Abroon QaziSchool of Business Administration, American University of Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6648-3306
Mohammed A OmarDepartment of Management Science & Engineering, Khalifa University of Science & Technology, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pregnancy and childbirth are commonly seen as positive experiences, but they can also pose distinct challenges and risks, especially when care is insufficient. This study investigates the factors influencing maternity patient experience by exploring the complex interactions among these factors. Using data from the 2021 maternity patient survey by the National Health Services (NHS) in England, we implemented a Bayesian Belief Network (BBN) to model these interactions. Three structural learning models were created, namely Bayesian Search (BS), Peter-Clark (PC), and Greedy Thick Thinning (GTT). Further, sensitivity analysis was conducted to quantify interactions among the influencing factors and identify the most influential factor affecting the outcome. The results underscore the importance of recognizing the interdependencies among the eight key domains of the survey, which collectively shape maternity care experiences. These factors include the start of care in pregnancy, antenatal check-ups, care during pregnancy, labour and birth, staff caring, care in the hospital, feeding the baby, and care after birth. These findings can guide healthcare managers and decision-makers in developing proactive strategies to mitigate factors impacting maternity patient experiences. Ultimately, this study contributes to the ongoing efforts to enhance the quality of maternity care and improve outcomes for mothers and their infants.

Indexed as

Maternal Health ServicesPatient SatisfactionAdultBayes TheoremEnglandFemaleHumansPregnancyPrenatal CareSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID39977449
PMCPMC11841908

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.