ArticlePloS one2025
A certificateless aggregate signature scheme for VANETs with privacy protection properties.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Security-Enhanced Certificateless Aggregate Signature-Based Conditional Privacy-Preserving Authentication Scheme for VANETs.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aggregate signatures are excellent in simultaneously verifying the validity of multiple signatures, which renders them highly suitable for bandwidth-constrained environments. The certificateless public key system is among the most advanced public key cryptosystems at present. Scholars have combined their advantages to develop certificateless aggregate signature schemes, which are applicable to the secure communication of Vehicular Ad-hoc Networks (VANETs). Recently, Cahyadi E F et al. put forward a certificateless aggregate signature scheme specifically designed for use in VANETs. Regrettably, through our strict security analysis, we discovered at least two major vulnerabilities in the signature scheme: a public key replacement attack and a malicious KGC (Key Generation Center) attack. To tackle these vulnerabilities, our article not only presents the methods of these attacks but also explores the fundamental reasons for their feasibility. Additionally, we propose specific improvement measures and show that the enhanced scheme retains its security under the random oracle model. The stability of the improved scheme depends on the computational complexity of the Diffie-Hellman problem. Finally, a comprehensive assessment involving security, computational cost, communicational cost, and calculational efficiency overhead highlights the excellent performance of our proposed solution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.