Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39977397›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

A hybrid multi-panel image segmentation framework for improved medical image retrieval system.

Faqir Gul, Mohsin Shah, Mushtaq Ali, Lal Hussain, Touseef Sadiq, Adeel Ahmed Abbasi, Mohammad Shahbaz Khan, Badr S Alkahtani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Faqir GulDepartment of Computer Science & IT, Hazara University, Mansehra, Pakistan.
Mohsin ShahDepartment of Telecommunication, Hazara University, Mansehra, Pakistan.
Mushtaq AliDepartment of Computer Science & IT, Hazara University, Mansehra, Pakistan.
Lal HussainDepartment of Computer Science & IT, Neelum Campus, The University of Azad Jammu and Kashmir, Muzaffarabad, Azad Kashmir, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0003-1103-4938
Touseef SadiqCentre for Artificial Intelligence Research (CAIR), Department of Information and Communication Technology, University of Agder, Grimstad, Norway.
Adeel Ahmed AbbasiCentral South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Mohammad Shahbaz KhanChildren's National Hospital, Washington, DC, United States of America.
Badr S AlkahtaniDepartment of Mathematics, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multi-panel images play an essential role in medical diagnostics and represent approximately 50% of the medical literature. These images serve as important tools for physicians to align various medical data (e.g., X-rays, MRIs, CT scans) of a patient into a consolidated image. This consolidated multi-panel image, represented by its component sub-images, contributes to a thorough representation of the patient's case during diagnosis. However, extracting sub-images from the multi-panel images poses significant challenges for medical image retrieval systems, especially when dealing with regular and irregular image layouts. To address these challenges, this paper presents a novel hybrid framework that significantly enhances sub-image retrieval. The framework classifies medical images, employs advanced computer vision and image processing techniques including image projection profiles and morphological operations, and performs efficient segmentation of various multi-panel image types including regular and irregular medical images. The hybrid approach ensures accurate indexing and facilitates fast retrieval of sub-images by medical image retrieval systems. To validate the proposed framework, experiments were conducted on a set of medical images from publicly available datasets, including ImageCLEFmed 2013 to ImageCLEFmed 2016. The results show better performance compared to other methods, attaining an accuracy of 90.50% in image type identification and 91% and 92% in regular and irregular multi-panel image segmentation tasks, respectively. By achieving accurate and efficient segmentation across diverse multi-panel image types, our framework demonstrates significant potential to improve the performance of medical image retrieval systems.

Indexed as

Diagnostic ImagingImage Processing, Computer-AssistedInformation Storage and RetrievalAlgorithmsHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID39977397
PMCPMC11841867

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.