Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39977288›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of managed care2025

Veterans Health Administration benefit value has little effect on reliance.

Yevgeniy Feyman, Allison Dorneo, Steven D Pizer, Christine Yee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of managed care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yevgeniy FeymanBoston University School of Public Health, 715 Albany St, Boston, MA 02118. Email: yfeyman@gmail.com.
Allison Dorneo
Steven D Pizer
Christine Yee

Funding

HSRD VA IP1 HX002374
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesUS military veterans have multiple options for health insurance coverage, including the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) and Medicare programs, which can lead to strategic selection of coverage and potentially inefficient budgetary allocations. Because coverage choices are likely to be a function of coverage availability and benefit value, understanding the relationship between benefit value and reliance on coverage is critical. STUDY

designAnalysis of cross-sectional, nationally representative survey data.

methodsThis analysis relied on a novel measure of benefit value for the VHA and Medicare Advantage (MA) programs and nationally representative survey data of veterans and their health care use for 2016 through 2019. Linear regressions controlling for beneficiary and market characteristics with state and year fixed effects were used to first estimate the effect of VHA benefit value relative to MA benefit value on MA enrollment, and then on veteran reliance on VHA-paid care conditional on MA enrollment.

resultsWe found that a $1 increase in relative VHA benefit value leads to at most a 0.2% (SE = 0.04) reduction in the probability of MA enrollment and a 0.3-percentage point (SE = 0.1) increase in reliance on VHA-paid care. Results were consistent across subgroups of enrollees, with slightly larger effects for enrollees with less generous benefits.

conclusionsFor most veterans, benefit value has a small, often nonsignificant, effect on reliance. These results imply that changes in VHA benefit value are unlikely to have major effects on veteran reliance on the VHA.

Indexed as

Insurance CoverageMedicare Part CUnited States Department of Veterans AffairsVeteransAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedUnited States

Identifiers

PMID39977288
PMCPMC12171973

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.