ArticleAnalytical chemistry2025
Solid-State Nanopore Sensors: Analyte Quantification by Event Frequency Analysis at High Voltages.
Article in Analytical chemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dynamics of Heparin Translocations Through Solid-State Nanopores.Electrophoresis · 2026Article
- Light-Driven, Phase-Locked Protein Pumping Through a Single Plasmonic Optofluidic Nanopore.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026Article
- Interrogating nanopores with light: optipore sensing for single molecule analyses.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2026Review
- Power Spectral Density Analysis of Solid-State Nanopore Signals: Application to Stability Estimation.ACS omega · 2026Article
- Directional Single-Protein Transport Enabled by 2D Material Heterointerfaces in Solid-State Nanopores: Implications for Single-Molecule Sensing.ACS applied nano materials · 2026Article
- Addressing the Challenges of Solid-State Nanopores: Strategies for Performance Enhancement.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- The Electric Field in Solid State Nanopores Causes Dissociation of Strong Biomolecular Interactions.Nano letters · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Solid state nanopores have emerged as an important electrical label-free single-molecule detection platform. While much effort has been spent on analyzing the current trace to determine size, shape and charge of the translocating species, a less studied aspect is the number of events and how this relates to analyte concentration. In this work we systematically investigate how the event frequency depends on voltage applied across the pore and show that this dependence can be utilized to determine target concentration. Importantly, this method does not require any calibration or any additional species added to the solution. Data analysis algorithms are introduced to accurately count events also for high voltages (up to 1 V). For double stranded DNA as model analyte, we find a linear relation between event frequency and voltage for pores 10 nm or more in diameter. For smaller pores, the majority of events are dockings rather than translocations and the linear relation is lost, in agreement with theory. Our model also predicts that the electrophoretic mobility of the species will influence event frequency, while diffusivity does not, which we confirm by using two different sizes of DNA. The analyte concentration determination is found to be remarkably accurate (10% error) when taking the average of multiple (∼4) experiments. If based on a single experiment, the predictive power is lower, but the method still provides a useful estimate (<30% error). This study should be useful as a guide when performing experiments at higher voltages and may serve as a method to extract analyte concentration in bioanalytical applications of nanopore sensors.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.