Article in Salud publica de Mexico, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Guillermo Tamayo-CabezaDepartment of Dental Public Health and Dental Informatics, Indiana University School of Dentistry. Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.. gtamayo@iu.edu.
Andrés Mantilla-RodríguezDepartment of Dental Public Health and Dental Informatics, Indiana University School of Dentistry. Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.. amantill@iupui.edu.
Alejandra CantoralHealth Department, Universidad Iberoamericana. Mexico City, Mexico.. alejandra.cantoral@ibero.mx.
Martha M Téllez-RojoCenter for Nutrition and Health Research, National Institute of Public Health. Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico.. mmtellez@insp.mx.
Karen E PetersonDepartment of Nutritional Sciences, University of Michigan School of Public Health. Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.. karenep@umich.edu.
Howard HuKeck School of Medicine, University of Southern California. Los Angeles, California, USA.. howard.hu@med.usc.edu.
Esperanza Ángeles Martínez-MierDepartment of Dental Public Health and Dental Informatics, Indiana University School of Dentistry. Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.. esmartin@iu.edu.
Funding
Translational Research Support CoreP30ES000002 · NIEHS · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (SCH OF PUBLIC HLTH) · PI JAIME ELIZABETH HART · 1985 to 2026
$44.6M
Strategic Vision & Impact on Environmental HealthP30ES017885 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Dana Dolinoy · 2011 to 2026
$21.3M
Pilot and Feasibility (P and F) ProgramP30DK089503 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Karen Eileen Peterson · 2010 to 2026
$20.3M
VANADIUM AND HUMAN HEALTHP42ES005947 · NIEHS · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (SCH OF PUBLIC HLTH) · PI KELSEY, KARL TIMOTHY · 1992 to 2006
$19.6M
Stress, Lead, Iron Deficiency and NeurodevelopmentR01ES013744 · NIEHS · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI Robert O Wright · 2007 to 2026
$13.4M
Superfund Metal Mixtures, Biomarkers and NeurodevelopmentP42ES016454 · NIEHS · HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI BELLINGER, DAVID C · 2010 to 2015
$10.1M
Statistics and Bioinformatics Core - WangU24DK097153 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI BURANT, CHARLES F · 2012 to 2017
$10.1M
LEAD DOSE BIOMARKERS, REPRODUCTION, AND INFANT OUTCOMESR01ES007821 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI PETERSON, KAREN EILEEN · 1998 to 2010
$4.7M
Project 3: Developmental Exposures and Diet: Epigenetics of Metabolic SyndromeP01ES022844 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI PADMANABHAN, VASANTHA, PETERSON, KAREN EILEEN · 2013 to 2018
$3.9M
Metal Mixtures and NeurodevelopmentR01ES014930 · NIEHS · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI WRIGHT, ROBERT O · 2006 to 2010
$3.2M
Prenatal and Childhood Exposure to Fluoride and NeurodevelopmentR01ES021446 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO · PI HU, HOWARD, MCLAUGHLIN, JOHN · 2012 to 2018
$2.3M
E3Gen: Multigenerational Influences of Social Structure on Toxicant Exposures and Life Course Health in the ELEMENT CohortR24ES028502 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Karen Eileen Peterson, Peter Xuekun Song · 2017 to 2026
objectiveThis study evaluated fluoride content in table salts from participants' households of the Element project, comparing them with the Mexican standards of fluoride content in table salt (200 to 250 mg/kg). MATERIALS AND
methodsSalt samples were collected from households of mother-offspring pairs participating in Element. Salt samples were analyzed in duplicates using a combination fluoride ion-selective electrode and a pH/ISE meter.
resultsAmong 657 samples from 14 brands, fluoride varied from 0.016 to 477.9 mg/kg with a median (IQR) of 142.5 (136.9). Of salts labeled as fluoridated or containing fluoride (n= 607), we found that 72.8% (n= 442) had fluoride content below the recommended range and 13.8% (n= 84) were above the Mexican norm. Only 81 salt samples (13.3%) fell within recommended limits.
conclusionFuture studies with representative sampling are needed to evaluate table salt fluoride content, especially in high-fluoride areas, to inform potential adjustments to the current monitoring program.
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
Fluoride content in table salt from the Element Project in Mexico City. · full record | OpenQuestion