ArticleJournal of vision2025
Serial bias and response time: Prior stimulus not only biases but also modulates the speed of decision for a new stimulus.
Article in Journal of vision, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Is repulsive serial bias in visual perception driven by adaptation mechanisms?Journal of vision · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A decade of research has demonstrated that the reported perception of a new stimulus can be biased by task-irrelevant prior stimuli. However, existing studies have primarily focused on explaining the direction and magnitude of this bias effect, often neglecting other relevant aspects of perceptual behavior that may also be influenced by prior stimuli. In this study, we examined how decision speed for a new stimulus might be influenced by prior stimuli in motion-direction estimation tasks. We found that direction reports exhibited a repulsive serial bias along with a systematic response time (RT) effect, where reports were faster when the prior motion direction was more dissimilar to the current motion direction. Follow-up experiments replicated this RT effect and showed that it occurred only when repulsive serial bias was evident. Subsequent analyses revealed that the RT effect was positively correlated with repulsive serial bias, indicating that both effects are driven by common underlying mechanisms. Together, these results demonstrate that prior stimuli not only bias but also modulate response speed to new stimuli, suggesting that existing theories should incorporate decisional mechanisms that influence response speed to fully account for the serial bias phenomenon.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.