ArticleJAMA network open2025
Use of Feeding Tubes Among Hospitalized Older Adults With Dementia.
Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- One-Year Outcomes After ICU Discharge in Patients Aged 80 Years and Older: Functional and Clinical Factors Associated with Mortality in a Retrospective Observational Cohort.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- A Narrative Review of Oral Hygiene and Pulmonary Health Amid Dysphagia: Implications for Feeding Route, Nutrition, and Quality of Life.Nutrients · 2026Review
- Administration of tirabrutinib suspension in a patient with primary central nervous system lymphoma: A case report.Oncology letters · 2026Article
- Association of serum albumin level, feeding route, and mobility status with pressure ulcer presence in bedridden adults receiving long-term care.BMC primary care · 2026Article
- Undernourished and Undertreated: The Role of Nutritional Care in Geriatric Hospital Outcomes.Nutrients · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Although dementia is a contraindication for feeding tube placement, guidelines recommending against its use are inconsistently followed, and factors associated with its use are unclear. Objective: To describe the incidence of feeding tube placement among hospitalized older adults (aged ≥65 years) with dementia and their health outcomes during and after hospitalization and to identify factors associated with placement of feeding tubes (ie, gastrostomy, gastrostomy-jejunostomy, and jejunostomy tubes). Design, Setting, and Participants: This population-based retrospective cohort study was conducted using a linked database in Ontario, Canada. Older adults who were diagnosed with dementia prior to a hospitalization between April 1, 2014, and March 31, 2018, were included. Data analyses were completed between October 2021 and November 2024. Exposures: Sociodemographic characteristics, health profiles, functional status, and advanced directives. Main Outcomes and Measures: Whether individuals received a feeding tube insertion (ie, gastrostomy, gastrostomy-jejunostomy, or jejunostomy tube), as identified by Ontario Health Insurance Plan billing codes. Results: Among 143 331 older adults with dementia (83 536 [58.3%] female; mean [SD] age, 83.8 [7.5] years), 1312 (0.9%) received a feeding tube in hospital and 142 019 (99.1%) did not. During hospitalization, feeding tube recipients stayed longer in hospital (mean [SD] stay, 65.6 [120.8] vs 14.8 [35.2] days for nonrecipients) and were more likely to be admitted to the intensive care unit (557 [42.5%] vs 14 423 [10.2%] of nonrecipients) or to die in hospital (294 [22.4%] vs 14 698 [10.3%] of nonrecipients). Within 1 year of discharge, 509 of 1018 feeding tube recipients (50.0%) died compared with 36 162 of 127 321 nonrecipients (28.4%). Among recipients of home care and long-term care residents, regression modeling showed that having swallowing problems (odds ratio [OR], 2.22; 95% CI, 1.99-2.49) and greater functional impairments (OR, 2.75; 95% CI, 1.80-4.20) were associated with increased odds of receiving a feeding tube, while being female (OR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.52-0.84), older (OR for every 5-year increase in age, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.70-0.81), having a do-not-resuscitate directive (OR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.31-0.47), and living in rural settings (OR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.22-0.66) were associated with reduced odds. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of hospitalized individuals with dementia, feeding tube insertion was not associated with improved survival or postdischarge outcomes. Factors that were (or were not) associated with feeding tube placement were sometimes misaligned with best practice guidelines. Goals of care conversations, alternative intervention options, and improved clinical protocols are recommended.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.