ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2025
Papillary craniopharyngioma management in the era of BRAF and MEK inhibition.
Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Efficacy and safety of BRAF-MEK dual inhibition in BRAF-V600E mutated papillary craniopharyngioma: a systematic review.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2025Pooled it
- Molecular therapy for papillary craniopharyngioma: a multi-institutional analysis of practice patterns across the RAPID Consortium.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2026Article
- Development and validation of a predictive model for hypothalamic obesity following craniopharyngioma resection.BMC endocrine disorders · 2026Article
- Systemic Molecularly Targeted Therapies for Neoadjuvant and Salvage Craniopharyngioma: A Contemporary Narrative Review.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Rapid and profound radiological and plasma ctDNA responses to dabrafenib plus trametinib in BRAF-mutant papillary craniopharyngioma.Neuro-oncology advancesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposePapillary craniopharyngioma is a rare entity, demonstrating BRAF-V600E mutations in approximately 95% of patients. Recently, a phase 2 trial of patients treated with surgery and BRAF/MEKi demonstrated 91% reduction in residual tumor volume. This study allowed for additional treatments at the discretion of the treatment team without reporting subsequent rates of endocrinopathy or visual decline. We aimed to evaluate the possibility of employing BRAF/MEKi without the need for adjuvant radiotherapy therapies.
methodsA retrospective report of two patients treated with resection and BRAF/MEKi without additional treatment were analyzed. Patient demographics, treatment characteristics, pre- and post-treatment radiographic volumes, adverse events, and endocrinologic and visual outcomes, were recorded and analyzed.
resultsTwo patients underwent subtotal resection followed by BRAF/MEKi without adjuvant treatment. Mean length of BRAF therapy was 21.4 months and MEKi therapy was 12.94 months. Mean preoperative nodule volume was 0.33 cm [3] and 2.29 cm [3] and cystic volume was 5.04 cm [3] and 6.18 cm [3] in case 1 and case 2, respectively. Neither patient received radiation. Grade 3 cardiotoxicity developed in case 1 after 6.5 months, with function recovering completely following discontinuation of MEKi. BRAF therapy was discontinued electively after 23.5 months. The second patient remains on dual inhibition therapy without toxicity. For these cases, post-treatment nodule volumes are 0.07 cm [3] (98.4% reduction) and 0.04 cm [3] (99.2% reduction), respectively, and cystic volume 0.0 cm [3] in both patients. Progression free survival is 100% with a mean follow up of 36-months.
conclusionsUtilizing surgery and BRAF/MEKi without adjuvant radiation, we demonstrate excellent disease control with reversible toxicity. Avoiding additional treatments may spare vital functions and unnecessary procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.