ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2025
Neurocognitive function in lower grade glioma patients selected for proton radiotherapy: real-world data from a prospective cohort study.
Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Survival, late toxicity and ability to return to work after proton radiotherapy for low-grade gliomas.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2026Article
- Reliable cognitive changes the first year following guideline-based treatment of isocitrate dehydrogenase mutated gliomas: A longitudinal multicenter study.Neuro-oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo determine neurocognitive function (NCF) profiles of patients with lower grade glioma (LGG) eligible to undergo proton radiotherapy (PRT), and how these relate to clinical and radiological characteristics. PRT is offered to those patients for whom sparing of NCF is considered important given their favorable prognosis. To date it is unknown to which extent their NCF profiles are favorable as well.
methodsA consecutive cohort of 151 LGG patients eligible for PRT according to prevailing Dutch criteria, referred between 2018 and 2023, were assessed with standardized neuropsychological tests prior to PRT. Scores were compared to norm-scores. Composite scores were calculated for the total NCF and 6 separate cognitive domains, and profiles were related to tumor location. Clinical and radiological factors characterizing overall NCF impaired patients were investigated, comparing 3 definitions for impairment.
resultsPatients had on average significantly lower NCF than their norm-group, but interindividual variability was large. For 100/151 patients (66.2%), all cognitive domains were intact, whereas 15/151 patients (9.9%) displayed multiple domain impairments. Poorer NCF was related to right-sided LGG laterality, larger PRT target volume, no Wait & Scan policy, worse neurological function and worse radiological indices (Fazekas and global cortical atrophy, respectively). LGG involvement of the left temporal and occipital lobes was associated with, respectively, lower verbal memory and processing speed.
conclusionPrior to PRT, the majority of selected LGG patients display favorable NCF profiles. However, a subgroup showed NCF impairments, with multiple relevant clinical and radiological covariates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.