Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39976891›Full record

ArticleNeurology and therapy2025

Effectiveness During 12-Month Adjunctive Brivaracetam Treatment in Patients with Focal-Onset Seizures in a Real-Life Setting: A Prospective, Observational Study in Europe.

Bernhard J Steinhoff, Jakob Christensen, Colin P Doherty, Marian Majoie, Anne-Liv Schulz, Fiona Brock, Dimitrios Bourikas, Iryna Leunikava, Anna Kelemen, Eduardo Rubio-Nazabal

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurology and therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02687711 (A 12-Month Noninterventional, Postmarketing, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Briviact®), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02687711 completednot on this map

A 12-Month Noninterventional, Postmarketing, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Briviact® (Brivaracetam) as Adjunctive Therapy in Patients With Epilepsy With Partial-onset Seizures in Daily Clinical Practice

TypeobservationalSponsorUCB Biopharma S.P.R.L.Ran2016 to 2020Enrolled544ConditionsEpilepsy With POS With or Without Secondary Generalization
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Observational
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Bernhard J SteinhoffKork Epilepsy Centre, Landstr. 1, 77694, Kehl-Kork, Germany. bsteinhoff@epilepsiezentrum.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5995-5862
Jakob ChristensenDepartment of Neurology, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 165, 8200, Aarhus N, Denmark.
Colin P DohertyTrinity College Dublin, 152-160 Pearse Street, Dublin, D02 R590, Ireland.
Marian MajoieAcademic Center of Epileptology Kempenhaeghe, Maastricht University Medical Center, Sterkselseweg 65, 5591 VE, Heeze, Netherlands.
Anne-Liv SchulzUCB, Alfred-Nobel-Straße 10, 40789, Monheim Am Rhein, Germany.
Fiona BrockUCB, 216 Bath Road, Slough, SL1 3WE, UK.
Dimitrios BourikasUCB, Agiou Dimitriou 63, 174 56, Alimos, Greece.
Iryna LeunikavaUCB, Alfred-Nobel-Straße 10, 40789, Monheim Am Rhein, Germany.
Anna KelemenOKITI, Laky Adolf U. 44, 1145, Budapest, Hungary.
Eduardo Rubio-NazabalCoruna University Hospital, Xubias de Arriba, 84, 15006, A Coruna, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3049-987X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionEfficacy/tolerability of adjunctive brivaracetam (BRV) for focal-onset seizures (FOS) in patients aged ≥ 16 years was established in randomized controlled trials. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of adjunctive BRV in patients (≥ 16 years) with FOS with/without focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures in daily clinical practice.

methodsA 12-month, prospective, real-world, noninterventional study in nine European countries (EP0077/NCT02687711). BRV was prescribed per clinical practice and European Summary of Product Characteristics. Eligible patients had never received BRV before inclusion. Treating physicians made the decision to prescribe BRV, independently of study participation. Primary effectiveness outcome: BRV retention rate at 12 months; secondary effectiveness outcomes: 50% responder rate, seizure freedom.

resultsA total of 544 patients received ≥ 1 BRV dose (mean age: 43.6 years; 52.8% female; mean time since diagnosis: 22.7 years). Patients had a mean of 7.3 lifetime antiseizure medications (ASMs) and median of 3.7 FOS/28 days during 3-month retrospective baseline. Median total ASM drug load (including BRV) was 3.0 at BRV initiation (n = 539) and 3.3 at study end (n = 314). At 12 months, 57.7% of 541 patients remained on BRV, 60.4% of 230 were responders (≥ 50% seizure reduction since baseline), and 13.8% of 269 were seizure-free since BRV initiation. Historical levetiracetam use appeared not to impact retention rate (56.6% of 320 and 59.3% of 221 patients with and without historical levetiracetam use, respectively). 36.0% of 544 patients had drug-related treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), mostly (≥ 5% of patients) drug ineffective (11.4%) and seizure (6.3%). The three most common drug-related TEAEs leading to permanent BRV discontinuation (of 544 patients) were drug ineffective (10.1%), seizure (5.1%), and behavior disorder (3.3%).

conclusionsAdjunctive BRV was effective in clinical practice in patients with predominantly difficult-to-treat FOS, as shown by BRV retention rate of 57.7% at 12 months, which is in line with real-world retention rates for other new-generation ASMs.

Indexed as

AdjunctiveAdolescentBrivaracetamEffectivenessEpilepsyFocal-onset seizureNoninterventionalObservationalReal-worldTolerability

Identifiers

PMID39976891
PMCPMC11906953

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.