ReviewHeart failure reviews2025
Worsening heart failure: progress, pitfalls, and perspectives.
Review in Heart failure reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Nursing interventions to enhance self-care in heart failure: a systematic review interpreted through the COM-B model.Systematic reviews · 2026Pooled it
- Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists reduce major adverse cardiovascular events and worsening heart failure in patients with heart failure: an umbrella meta-analysis.BMC endocrine disorders · 2026Pooled it
- The 'Chloride Theory' for Heart Failure Pathophysiology: An Updated Narrative Review 2025.Cardiology and therapy · 2026Review
- Mapping the research landscape of artificial intelligence in heart failure: a bibliometric analysis.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Article
- Phenotype-Specific Gradients of NT-proBNP Reflect Distinct Functional and Structural Remodeling Signatures in Heart Failure.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Association of triglyceride-cholesterol-body weight index with in-hospital mortality in critically ill patients with heart failure.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- One-year multicenter prospective real-world study of vericiguat effectiveness and safety in Spain.ESC heart failure · 2026Observational
- Dyadic Health Literacy and Its Association with Care Collaboration and Satisfaction in Heart Failure Patient-Caregiver Dyads: A Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Article
- Predicting heart failure decompensation: focus on non-invasive monitoring.Cardiology journal · 2026Review
- Review
- Effectiveness and safety of vericiguat in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction: a narrative review of real-world evidence studies.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
For most patients with chronic heart failure (HF), the clinical course of the disease includes periods of apparent clinical stability punctuated by episodes of clinical deterioration with worsening signs and symptoms, a condition referred to as worsening heart failure (WHF). Over time, episodes of WHF may become more frequent, and patients may enter a cycle of recurrent events associated with deterioration in their quality of life and functional capacity, hospitalizations, and ultimately death. WHF is apparently an old concept but seems to have acquired new boundaries in terms of definition and clinical and prognostic value due to the fast-paced evolution of the HF treatment landscape and the emergence of new drugs in this setting. As a result, the management of WHF is being reshaped. In the present paper, a group of HF experts gathered to discuss the concept, prevention, detection, and treatment of WHF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.