ArticlePhotosynthesis research2025
Spectral response of gross primary production to in situ canopy light absorption coefficient of chlorophyll.
Article in Photosynthesis research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The amount of absorbed light is one of the main factors governing plant photosynthesis, and ultimately, the gross primary production (GPP) of vegetation. Since canopy chlorophyll (Chl) content defines the amount of light that can be absorbed (thus the amount of energy available for photosynthesis), it is representative of the status of the photosynthetic apparatus and directly relates with vegetation productivity. The non-invasive assessment of these traits is the foundation of proximal and remote sensing and of high-throughput phenotyping of plants. The goal of this study is to explore: (i) the response of GPP to the absorption coefficient of Chl derived from canopy reflectance (i.e., assessed in situ) across the PAR and red-edge spectral regions in two plant species with contrasting biochemistry, structural properties, and photosynthetic pathway; (ii) the efficiency of contrasting plants in absorbing radiation and converting it into photosynthetic carbon uptake. The spectral composition of light absorbed by vegetation and the contribution of each spectral range to GPP were quantified. The highest responses of GPP to the Chl absorption coefficient occurred in the red-edge and green spectral regions. More notably, in contrasting plant species the GPP responses in the visible and red-edge spectral regions were almost identical and close to the quantum yield of CO
Indexed as
Identifiers
39976850What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.