ArticleJournal of applied genetics2025
Endometrial factors and pregnancy loss frequency in recurrent pregnancy loss patients: comparing RT-PCR microbiology, microbial cultures, and immunohistochemistry of endometrium biopsy.
Article in Journal of applied genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The objective of this study is to investigate the presence of bacteria in endometrial samples from patients with recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) and explore potential correlations between bacterial presence, chronic endometritis, and previous pregnancy loss history. Endometrial samples from 90 RPL patients were analysed using RT-PCR to detect 10 specific bacterial species. A subgroup of 65 patients underwent additional microbial culture and immunohistochemistry for plasma cell identification. Correlations between bacterial presence, chronic endometritis, and the number of previous pregnancy losses were evaluated. We detected at least one out of 10 chosen bacteria DNA by RT-PCR in 24.4% (22/90) of endometrial samples. Patients with PCR-identified bacteria had a significantly higher number of previous pregnancy losses (median 3 vs 2, p = 0.01). No correlation was observed between bacterial presence and chronic endometritis diagnosis. A significant correlation was found between bacterial detection by PCR and microbial culture (p = 0.03), though culture methods detected fewer positive cases. In RPL patients, detecting DNA from at least one of 10 selected bacterial species by RT-PCR correlates with a higher number of previous pregnancy losses. However, this bacterial presence does not correlate with chronic endometritis diagnosis based on the CD138 immunohistochemistry-identified plasma cell count. These findings suggest a potential role of endometrial bacteria in RPL that may be independent of the classical inflammatory response associated with chronic endometritis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.