ArticleBreast cancer (Tokyo, Japan)2025
The impact of axillary lymph-node dissection omission on adjuvant abemaciclib eligibility in HR-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer with positive sentinel lymph nodes.
Article in Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Omitting axillary lymph node dissection or not? A multicenter, retrospective study for breast cancer patients potentially eligible for abemaciclib since the SENOMAC trial.World journal of surgical oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe MonarchE trial demonstrated the additional benefit of abemaciclib as an adjuvant endocrine therapy for high-risk patients with hormone receptor (HR)-positive HER2-negative breast cancer. Meanwhile, the ACOSOG Z0011 trial established the omission of axillary lymph-node dissection (ALND) as a standard practice in certain patients with positive sentinel lymph-node biopsy (SNB). However, as the MonarchE eligibility criteria include the presence of four or more lymph-node metastases, omitting ALND may hinder the assessment of abemaciclib eligibility in some cases.
methodsThe study population consisted of patients with clinically node-negative, HR-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer who underwent SNB at our institution between January 2008 and December 2021. The proportion of patients meeting the MonarchE cohort1 criteria, and the potential impact of ALND omission on abemaciclib eligibility were assessed.
resultsAmong the 1537 patients, 189 underwent SNB followed by ALND due to the presence of one or more positive sentinel nodes. Of these, 69 (36.5%) were eligible for abemaciclib. Eligibility was uncertain without ALND in 138 patients. Among the 138 patients, 124 were candidates for ALND omission, including 11 who were found to have four or more metastatic lymph nodes after completing ALND.
conclusionsA few cases were identified in which abemaciclib eligibility was not properly determined due to ALND omission. This suggests that omitting ALND following SNB, when two of fewer positive nodes are detected, may not significantly impact the determination of abemaciclib eligibility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39976837What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.