ReviewInfection2025
Toxigenic Corynebacterium ulcerans in raw milk of a cow with acute mastitis: case report and historical review on milk-transmitted diphtheria.
Review in Infection, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeHistorically, a considerable number of diphtheria outbreaks, mainly in the UK and the USA, have been epidemiologically or bacteriologically linked to the consumption of milk and dairy products. However, with the introduction of milk pasteurization and hygienic improvements in livestock farming and animal welfare, no cases of milk-linked human diphtheria outbreaks or bovine mastitis due to toxigenic corynebacterial have been reported in the recent decades. Here we report the first isolation of a toxigenic Corynebacterium ulcerans strain from the milk of a cow with acute mastitis within nearly 40 years and outside of UK or Finland.
methodsThe isolated strain was analysed by state-of-the-art bacteriological methods including toxigenicity testing by a novel Lateral Flow Immunoassay and Elek test, molecular typing was done by whole genome sequencing and MLST/cgMLST analysis. Due to the rarity of our finding, an extensive historical review of milk-associated diphtheria outbreaks was performed.
resultsThe obtained sequence type ST-331 is also found in human isolates of cutaneous diphtheria. cgMLST analysis, however, found no close relationship to 43 human ST-331 isolates from our German strain collection or to two animal samples from a zoonic cluster of this ST.
conclusionThe risk of milk-associated diphtheria due to C. ulcerans, although today extremely rare, should be avoided by milk pasteurization and the respective hygienic standards.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39976805What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.