ArticleArchives of virology2025
Identification and complete genome sequence of honeysuckle-associated cytorhabdovirus in China.
Article in Archives of virology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A putatively novel cytorhabdovirus, tentatively named "honeysuckle-associated cytorhabdovirus" (HaCV), was identified by high-throughput sequencing in honeysuckle plants exhibiting chlorosis and mottling symptoms. Five isolates were obtained in this study, all of which were found to have a similar genome structure, ranging in length from 13,891 to 13,930 nucleotides and containing eight open reading frames (ORFs). In addition to ORFs encoding the five canonical proteins N, P, M, G, and L, these isolates had an ORF within the P gene, one between the P and M genes, and one between the G and L genes, encoding the putative proteins P', P3, and P6, respectively. Although phylogenetic analysis showed that all five isolates were most closely related to triticum alphacytorhabdovirus 1 (TriACRV1), genome sequence comparisons showed that the level of sequence identity of isolate FQ3 to TriACRV1 and the other isolates was below the threshold for species demarcation in the genus Cytorhabdovirus (< 75%), whereas the other four isolates- FQ1, FQ2, FQ4, and FQ5- exhibited greater than 75% sequence identity to TriACRV1. Thus, according to the current criteria, the isolates FQ1, FQ2, FQ4, and FQ5 should be considered isolates of TriACRV1, while isolate FQ3 should be classified as a member of a new species.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39976771What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.