ReviewChild's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery2025
Neuroimaging of middle cerebral artery anomalies: a report of three cases.
Review in Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- When thrombus points to the culprit and meets middle cerebral artery anomalies.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026Article
- Insights in the pathogenesis of twig MCA: time to consider it an abnormality?Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026Article
- Neurovascular Issues in Neurofibromatosis Type I: Focus on Intracranial Stenosis.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis is a description of the main middle cerebral artery (MCA) anomalies from the neuroradiological and embryological point of view, discussing the practical implications and the association with other vascular diseases.
methodsAmong the patients who underwent digital subtraction angiography (DSA) at our institution in a short time period (from 1 January 2021 to 31 December 2023), we selected three cases with high-quality images, representative for the main MCA anomalies, i.e., accessory, duplicated, and twig-like MCA.
resultsWe describe a series of three cases, illustrating the three main embryological anomalies of MCA, including accessory MCA, duplicated MCA, and twig-like MCA. All patients underwent neuroradiological investigations at our institution because of the acute occurrence of neurological symptoms and the findings are presented using computed tomography angiography (CTA), magnetic resonance angiography (MRA), and DSA with a detailed description. These three variants have a very low prevalence and they were reported and described more systematically in the Asian population than in the European population. Both noninvasive and invasive neuroimaging techniques were used for investigating these patients, and catheter angiography still provides the more informative content for precisely imaging the angioarchitecture of these variants and the association with aneurysms on other cerebral arteries. The knowledge of the embryology of these variants is of paramount importance in order to make easier their identification and reporting and to enhance their understanding.
conclusionsMCA anomalies should be known and carefully checked in order to avoid misdiagnosis with disease and may affect the treatment of acute stroke.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39976765What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.