Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39976732›Full record

SynthesisEuropean journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society2025

Impact of deep learning on pediatric elbow fracture detection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Le Nguyen Binh, Nguyen Thanh Nhu, Pham Thi Uyen Nhi, Do Le Hoang Son, Nguyen Bach, Hoang Quoc Huy, Nguyen Quoc Khanh Le, Jiunn-Horng Kang

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Postoperative Outcomes of Anteromedial Approach in Patients with Elbow Varus Posteromedial Rotatory Instability: A Retrospective Study.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Le Nguyen Binh *College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, 11031, Taiwan.
Nguyen Thanh NhuCollege of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, 11031, Taiwan.
Pham Thi Uyen NhiHo Chi Minh City Hospital of Dermato-Venereology, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Do Le Hoang SonDepartment of Orthopedics and Trauma, Cho Ray Hospital, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Nguyen BachFaculty of Medicine, Can Tho University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Can Tho, 94117, Vietnam.
Hoang Quoc HuyFaculty of Medicine, Can Tho University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Can Tho, 94117, Vietnam.
Nguyen Quoc Khanh LeAIBioMed Research Group, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, 11031, Taiwan. khanhlee@tmu.edu.tw.
Jiunn-Horng Kang *College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, 11031, Taiwan. jhk@tmu.edu.tw.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7850-4140

Funding

Ministry of Education DP2-TMU-113-A-08
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesPediatric elbow fractures are a common injury among children. Recent advancements in artificial intelligence (AI), particularly deep learning (DL), have shown promise in diagnosing these fractures. This study systematically evaluated the performance of DL models in detecting pediatric elbow fractures. MATERIALS AND

methodsA comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed (Medline), EMBASE, and IEEE Xplore for studies published up to October 20, 2023. Studies employing DL models for detecting elbow fractures in patients aged 0 to 16 years were included. Key performance metrics, including sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC), were extracted. The study was registered in PROSPERO (ID: CRD42023470558).

resultsThe search identified 22 studies, of which six met the inclusion criteria for the meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity of DL models for pediatric elbow fracture detection was 0.93 (95% CI: 0.91-0.96). Specificity values ranged from 0.84 to 0.92 across studies, with a pooled estimate of 0.89 (95% CI: 0.85-0.92). The AUC ranged from 0.91 to 0.99, with a pooled estimate of 0.95 (95% CI: 0.93-0.97). Further analysis highlighted the impact of preprocessing techniques and the choice of model backbone architecture on performance.

conclusionDL models demonstrate exceptional accuracy in detecting pediatric elbow fractures. For optimal performance, we recommend leveraging backbone architectures like ResNet, combined with manual preprocessing supervised by radiology and orthopedic experts.

Indexed as

Deep LearningElbow FracturesAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolHumansInfantInfant, NewbornSensitivity and SpecificityConvolutional neural networkDeep learningMedical imaging diagnosticsMeta-analysisObject detectionPediatric elbow fracture

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.