Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39976703›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2025

Artificial intelligence-powered coronary artery disease diagnosis from SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging: a comprehensive deep learning study.

Ghasem Hajianfar, Omid Gharibi, Maziar Sabouri, Mobin Mohebi, Mehdi Amini, Mohammad Javad Yasemi, Mohammad Chehreghani, Mehdi Maghsudi, Zahra Mansouri, Mohammad Edalat-Javid and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. AI in SPECT Imaging: Opportunities and Challenges.Seminars in nuclear medicine · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Ghasem HajianfarDivision of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva 4, CH-1211, Switzerland.
Omid GharibiDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Maziar SabouriDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Mobin MohebiInstitut de Biologie Valrose (IBV), Université Côte d'Azur, CNRS, Inserm, Nice, France.
Mehdi AminiDivision of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva 4, CH-1211, Switzerland.
Mohammad Javad YasemiRajaie Cardiovascular Medical and Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mohammad ChehreghaniRajaie Cardiovascular Medical and Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mehdi MaghsudiRajaie Cardiovascular Medical and Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Zahra MansouriDivision of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva 4, CH-1211, Switzerland.
Mohammad Edalat-JavidRajaie Cardiovascular Medical and Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Setareh ValaviRajaie Cardiovascular Medical and Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Ahmad Bitarafan RajabiRajaie Cardiovascular Medical and Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Yazdan SalimiDivision of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva 4, CH-1211, Switzerland.
Hossein ArabiDivision of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva 4, CH-1211, Switzerland.
Arman RahmimDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Isaac ShiriDivision of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva 4, CH-1211, Switzerland.
Habib ZaidiDivision of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva 4, CH-1211, Switzerland. habib.zaidi@hcuge.ch.ORCID 0000-0001-7559-5297

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMyocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) using single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) is a well-established modality for noninvasive diagnostic assessment of coronary artery disease (CAD). However, the time-consuming and experience-dependent visual interpretation of SPECT images remains a limitation in the clinic. PURPOSE: We aimed to develop advanced models to diagnose CAD using different supervised and semi-supervised deep learning (DL) algorithms and training strategies, including transfer learning and data augmentation, with SPECT-MPI and invasive coronary angiography (ICA) as standard of reference. MATERIALS AND

methodsA total of 940 patients who underwent SPECT-MPI were enrolled (281 patients included ICA). Quantitative perfusion SPECT (QPS) was used to extract polar maps of rest and stress states. We defined two different tasks, including (1) Automated CAD diagnosis with expert reader (ER) assessment of SPECT-MPI as reference, and (2) CAD diagnosis from SPECT-MPI based on reference ICA reports. In task 2, we used 6 strategies for training DL models. We implemented 13 different DL models along with 4 input types with and without data augmentation (WAug and WoAug) to train, validate, and test the DL models (728 models). One hundred patients with ICA as standard of reference (the same patients in task 1) were used to evaluate models per vessel and per patient. Metrics, such as the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, precision, and balanced accuracy were reported. DeLong and pairwise Wilcoxon rank sum tests were respectively used to compare models and strategies after 1000 bootstraps on the test data for all models. We also compared the performance of our best DL model to ER's diagnosis.

resultsIn task 1, DenseNet201 Late Fusion (AUC = 0.89) and ResNet152V2 Late Fusion (AUC = 0.83) models outperformed other models in per-vessel and per-patient analyses, respectively. In task 2, the best models for CAD prediction based on ICA were Strategy 3 (a combination of ER- and ICA-based diagnosis in train data), WoAug InceptionResNetV2 EarlyFusion (AUC = 0.71), and Strategy 5 (semi-supervised approach) WoAug ResNet152V2 EarlyFusion (AUC = 0.77) in per-vessel and per-patient analyses, respectively. Moreover, saliency maps showed that models could be helpful for focusing on relevant spots for decision making.

conclusionOur study confirmed the potential of DL-based analysis of SPECT-MPI polar maps in CAD diagnosis. In the automation of ER-based diagnosis, models' performance was promising showing accuracy close to expert-level analysis. It demonstrated that using different strategies of data combination, such as including those with and without ICA, along with different training methods, like semi-supervised learning, can increase the performance of DL models. The proposed DL models could be coupled with computer-aided diagnosis systems and be used as an assistant to nuclear medicine physicians to improve their diagnosis and reporting, but only in the LAD territory. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceCoronary Artery DiseaseDeep LearningMyocardial Perfusion ImagingTomography, Emission-Computed, Single-PhotonAgedFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMaleMiddle AgedCoronary artery diseaseDeep learningObstructive CADSPECT-MPI

Identifiers

PMID39976703
PMCPMC12162751

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.