ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2026
Improving the accuracy of current sagittal alignment evaluation system centered around pelvic incidence: a new machine-learning based classification.
Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe study's aim was to characterize the variations in spinopelvic alignment among an asymptomatic population and to establish a classification system for this alignment. Additionally, it sought to formulate predictive formulas for lumbar lordosis (LL) based on pelvic incidence (PI) to enhance the accuracy of spinal balance assessments.
methodsThis cross-sectional study included 726 asymptomatic individuals. Sagittal parameters were assessed through radiographic evaluation. Participants were categorized into clusters using K-means clustering. A decision tree incorporating PI and sacral slope (SS) was utilized to define the classification criteria. Linear regression models were developed to predict LL and PT, integrating the newly established classification.
resultsThe sample was evenly divided into three clusters with distinct PI and LL averages. Cluster-specific predictive formulas for LL and SS were generated, highlighting the importance of spinopelvic alignment in spinal balance. For instance, in one cluster, the formula for LL was LL = 0.68*PI + 24.82, indicating a moderate correlation.
conclusionThe research successfully identified different patterns of sagittal balance and developed cluster-specific predictive formulas for LL based on PI. The findings underscore the significance of recognizing the anteverted pelvic subgroup for improving the precision of LL and SS predictions, which is vital for spinal surgery planning and achieving optimal sagittal balance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39976695What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.