Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39976694›Full record

ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2025

Differentiation of typical features between Fungal spondylitis and Brucellar spondylitis on CT and new applications of CT values in diagnosis of spinal infections.

Haoran Qi, Jun Qi, Rongpan Dang, Jingyu Wang, Hongdong Tan, Jing Li

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Haoran QiDepartment of Spine Surgery, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.
Jun QiLaboratory Department, Shandong Public Health Clinical Center Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Rongpan DangDepartment of Orthopedics, Shandong Public Health Clinical Center Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Jingyu WangDepartment of Spine Surgery, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.
Hongdong TanDepartment of Orthopedics, Shandong Public Health Clinical Center Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, China. tanhongdongspine@sina.com.
Jing LiDepartment of Spine Surgery, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China. jingli1969@csu.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe low positive rate of microorganism culture and nonspecific clinical manifestations increase the difficulty of diagnosing spinal infection. To date, no studies have reported differences in radiological manifestations between fungal spondylitis (FS) and brucellar spondylitis (BS). This may lead to severe misdiagnosis. In this study, we aimed to investigate the typical radiological features of these two types of spondylitis and evaluate the application of computed tomography (CT) values in their diagnosis.

methodsA total of 59 elderly patients with 119 infected vertebrae were included. 44 patients with 91 infected vertebrae were included in the BS group, and 15 patients with 28 infected vertebrae were included in the FS group. Differences in radiological features and parameters were compared by using the Mann-Whitney U test, χ

resultsFramework destruction was a typical imaging feature in patients with FS (p < 0.001). In contrast, patients with BS were more prone to concave destruction (p = 0.002), corner destruction (p = 0.010) and severe marginal osteosclerosis (p < 0.001). The longitudinal erosion ratio (AUC = 0.948) and CT value (AUC = 0.789) exhibited excellent diagnostic utility.

conclusionsThe degree of bone destruction and severity of osteosclerosis significantly differed between the two types of spondylitis. Measuring the CT value and erosion ratio facilitates increased diagnostic accuracy and efficiency.

Indexed as

BrucellosisMycosesSpondylitisTomography, X-Ray ComputedAgedAged, 80 and overDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesBrucellosisCTFungiRadiologySpondylitis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.