ReviewInternational urogynecology journal2025
Long-Term Results after Early Secondary Repair of Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury: A Case Series and Literature Review.
Review in International urogynecology journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Short-Term and Long-Term Outcomes and Predictors of Complications Following Major Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injuries.International urogynecology journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introduction and hypothesisThe incidence of obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI) is 3.6-6% of women with vaginal deliveries. Complications to OASI are common, and secondary repair is needed in 2.6-3%. Traditionally, secondary repair has been postponed until wound healing, but studies have shown that early secondary repair within 21 days can be safely performed.
methodsThe aim of this cohort study and literature review was to investigate the long-term outcomes after early secondary repair with focus on anal incontinence, quality of life and impact on sexual function with the use of International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Bowel (ICIQ-B).
resultsA total of 17 patients underwent early secondary repair after OASI within the study period and 11 answered and returned the long-term follow-up questionnaire. Seven had no postoperative complications, nine had infection and two developed recto-vaginal fistulas that needed subsequent surgical treatment. Median follow-up period was 5 years (2.3-5.7). At long-term, ten women (91%) reported fecal urgency, nine (82%) flatal and liquid incontinence, six (55%) problems with soiling and six (55%) unpredictable bowel accidents. Five women (45%) planned daily activities to accommodate their anal incontinence and three (27%) stayed at home because of anal incontinence. Seven women (64%) reported restrictions in their sexual relations due to anal incontinence.
conclusionsIn conclusion, early secondary repair of OASI in women with severe wound dehiscence involving the anal sphincter may be necessary. However, this group have a high risk of anal incontinence, negative impact on quality of life, and risk of sexual dysfunction at long-term follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.