Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39976470›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical research in pediatric endocrinology2025

Evaluation of Heavy Menstrual Bleeding in Adolescents

Tuğba Kontbay Çetin, Zuhal Keskin Sarılar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical research in pediatric endocrinology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Tuğba Kontbay ÇetinUniversity of Health Sciences Türkiye, Samsun Training and Research Hospital, Clinic of Pediatric Endocrinology, Samsun, TürkiyeORCID 0000-0001-7702-8296
Zuhal Keskin SarılarSamsun University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Pediatric Hematology, Samsun, TürkiyeORCID 0000-0001-8689-4014

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) in adolescents often manifests as “excessive bleeding” and may result in acute anemia requiring emergency treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic and management options for adolescents with HMB. Methods: Retrospective data were collected from patients’ medical records. Adolescents were classified based on the degree of anemia: Group 1 included patients with hemoglobin (Hb) levels of <8 g/dL; Group 2, Hb levels of 8-10 g/dL; Group 3, Hb levels of 10-12 g/dL; and Group 4, Hb levels of ≥12 g/dL. Admission and follow-up characteristics were compared across groups. Results: The cohort consisted of 122 adolescents with a mean age of 13.7±1.9 years, 42.7% of whom experienced menstrual irregularity within two years of menarche. The median duration of bleeding was 16 (10-30) days. Anovulation was identified in 57.8% of patients. Polycystic ovary syndrome was diagnosed in 32 (25%) adolescents, hypothyroidism in 6 (4.7%), uterine structural anomalies in 3 (2.3%), and hyperprolactinemia in 3 (2.3%), 2 of whom had microprolactinoma. One adolescent was diagnosed with von Willebrand disease following a hematological evaluation. Conclusion: Primary care providers should understand normal menstrual cycle patterns and thus be adept at identifying HMB. Early recognition of the underlying etiology in adolescents facilitates timely diagnosis, helping to prevent severe anemia and potential hospitalization.

Indexed as

MenorrhagiaAdolescentAnemiaChildFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHemoglobinsHumansRetrospective StudiesHemoglobinsabnormal uterine bleedingadolescentHeavy menstrual bleeding

Identifiers

PMID39976470
PMCPMC12699085

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.