Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39976436›Full record

ArticlemSystems2025

Integrating sequence composition information into microbial diversity analyses with k-mer frequency counting.

Nicholas A Bokulich

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in mSystems, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Nicholas A BokulichDepartment of Health Sciences and Technology, ETH Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-1784-8935

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

k-mer frequency information in biological sequences is used for a wide range of applications, including taxonomy classification, sequence similarity estimation, and supervised learning. However, in spite of its widespread utility, k-mer counting has been largely neglected for diversity estimation. This work examines the application of k-mer counting for alpha and beta diversity as well as supervised classification from microbiome marker-gene sequencing data sets (16S rRNA gene and full-length fungal internal transcribed spacer [ITS] sequences). Results demonstrate a close correspondence with phylogenetically aware diversity metrics, and advantages for using k-mer-based metrics for measuring microbial biodiversity in microbiome sequencing surveys. k-mer counting appears to be a suitable and efficient strategy for feature processing prior to diversity estimation as well as supervised learning in microbiome surveys. This allows the incorporation of subsequence-level information into diversity estimation without the computational cost of pairwise sequence alignment. k-mer counting is proposed as a complementary approach for feature processing prior to diversity estimation and supervised learning analyses, enabling large-scale reference-free profiling of microbiomes in biogeography, ecology, and biomedical data. A method for k-mer counting from marker-gene sequence data is implemented in the QIIME 2 plugin q2-kmerizer (https://github.com/bokulich-lab/q2-kmerizer). IMPORTANCE: k-mers are all of the subsequences of length k that comprise a sequence. Comparing the frequency of k-mers in DNA sequences yields valuable information about the composition of these sequences and their similarity. This work demonstrates that k-mer frequencies from marker-gene sequence surveys can be used to inform diversity estimates and machine learning predictions that incorporate sequence composition information. Alpha and beta diversity estimates based on k-mer frequencies closely correspond to phylogenetically aware diversity metrics, suggesting that k-mer-based diversity estimates are useful proxy measurements especially when reliable phylogenies are not available, as is often the case for some DNA sequence targets such as for internal transcribed spacer sequences.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaSequence Analysis, DNABiodiversityDNA, Ribosomal SpacerPhylogenyRNA, Ribosomal, 16SDNA, Ribosomal SpacerRNA, Ribosomal, 16Salpha diversitybeta diversitymarker-gene sequencingmicrobiomesupervised learning

Identifiers

PMID39976436
PMCPMC11915819

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.